On the integration of product and process models in engineering design

被引：19

作者：

Eckert C.M. ^{[1
]}

Wynn D.C. ^{[2
]}

Maier J.F. ^{[3
]}

Albers A. ^{[4
]}

Bursac N. ^{[4
]}

Xin Chen H.L. ^{[3
]}

Clarkson P.J. ^{[3
]}

Gericke K. ^{[5
]}

Gladysz B. ^{[4
]}

Shapiro D. ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Engineering and Innovation, Open University, Milton Keynes

[2] Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Auckland, Auckland

[3] Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge

[4] IPEK Institute of Product Engineering, KIT Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe

[5] Engineering Design and Methodology Group, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette

来源：

Design Science | 2017年 / 3卷

关键词：

design process models; model integration; organising framework; product models;

D O I：

10.1017/dsj.2017.2

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Models of products and design processes are key to interacting with engineering designs and managing the processes by which they are developed. In practice, companies maintain networks of many interrelated models which need to be synthesised in the minds of their users when considering issues that cut across them. This article considers how information from product and design process models can be integrated with a view to help manage these complex interrelationships. A framework highlighting key issues surrounding model integration is introduced and terminology for describing these issues is developed. To illustrate the framework and terminology, selected modelling approaches that integrate product and process information are discussed and organised according to their levels and forms of integration. Opportunities for further work to advance integrated modelling in engineering design research and practice are discussed. Copyright © The Author(s) 2017.

引用

共 67 条

[1]

Abramovici M., Chasiotis C., Integrated documentation of procedural knowledge in product development, Proceedings of Integrated Product and Process Development (IPPD, (2002)

[2]

Ahmad N., Wynn D.C., Clarkson P.J., When should design changes be allowed to accumulate?, Proceedings of IDMME-Virtual Concept 2010, Bordeaux, France, (2010)

[3]

Ahmad N., Wynn D.C., Clarkson P.J., Change impact on a product and its redesign process: A tool for knowledge capture and reuse, Research in Engineering Design, 24, 3, pp. 219-244, (2013)

[4]

Albers A., Braun A., A generalized framework to compass and to support complex product engineering processes, International Journal of Product Development, 15, 1-3, pp. 6-25, (2011)

[5]

Ariyo O.O., Eckert C.M., Clarkson P.J., Challenges in identifying the knock-on effects of engineering change, International Journal of Design Engineering, 2, 4, pp. 414-431, (2009)

[6]

Arndt H., Klein R., An ontology-based collaborative framework for decision support in engineering, Digital Enterprise Challenges: Life-Cycle Approach to Management and Production, pp. 369-381, (2002)

[7]

Aurisicchio M., Bracewell R., Capturing an integrated design information space with a diagram-based approach, Journal of Engineering Design, 24, 6, pp. 397-428, (2013)

[8]

Baxter D., Gao J., Case K., Harding J., Young B., Cochrane S., Dani S., An engineering design knowledge reuse methodology using process modelling, Research in Engineering Design, 18, 1, pp. 37-48, (2007)

[9]

Bernard A., Labrousse M., Perry N., LC universal model for the enterprise information system structure, Innovation in Life Cycle Engineering and Sustainable Development, pp. 429-446, (2006)

[10]

Box G.E.P., Draper N.R., Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces, (1987)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 →