Forum: European Nuclear Deterrence and Donald Trump

被引:2
作者
Fayet, Heloise [1 ,2 ]
Futter, Andrew [3 ]
Kuehn, Ulrich [4 ,5 ]
Kulesa, Lukasz [6 ]
van Hooft, Paul [7 ]
Bruusgaard, Kristin Ven [8 ]
机构
[1] Inst Francais Relat Int IFRI, Secur Studies Ctr, Paris, France
[2] Inst Francais Relat Int IFRI, Deterrence & Proliferat Res Programme, Paris, France
[3] Univ Leicester, Int Polit, Leicester, England
[4] Univ Hamburg, Inst Peace Res & Secur Policy, Arms Control & Emerging Technol Programme, Hamburg, Germany
[5] Carnegie Endowment Int Peace, Washington, DC USA
[6] Royal United Serv Inst RUSI, Proliferat & Nucl Policy, London, England
[7] RAND Europe, Santa Monica, CA USA
[8] Norwegian Intelligence Sch, Oslo, Norway
关键词
onventional deterrence; Donald Trump; European Long-range Strike Approach (ELSA); France; NATO; Netherlands; Nordic countries; nuclear deterrence; Nuclear Planning Group; nuclear sharing; Poland; three nuclear nos; United Kingdom; United States;
D O I
10.1080/00396338.2025.2459011
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
Despite Donald Trump's return, complete US disengagement from Europe is not inevitable. America will continue to have strategic interests in Europe. Building a separate European nuclear deterrent is not yet necessary. But it is clear that the Trump administration will devalue transatlantic relations and turn its strategic attention to the Indo-Pacific. Dutch, Nordic and Polish analysts agree with their British, French and German colleagues that firming up European nuclear and conventional deterrence, in particular vis-a-vis Russia, calls for better coordination between Berlin, London and Paris, and deeper and more systematic consultation with other capitals. Europe needs to invest in conventional deterrence assets and increase nuclear arsenals. France and Britain could share more information about their nuclear capabilities and plans with their European allies, and Paris should drop its aversion to participating in NATO's internal nuclear deliberations and join the Nuclear Planning Group. Joint exercises could be enhanced. Europe also needs a long-term political strategy for stabilising its relationship with Russia.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 142
页数:20
相关论文
共 34 条
[11]   Conventional Counterforce Dilemmas: South Korea's Deterrence Strategy and Stability on the Korean Peninsula [J].
Bowers, Ian ;
Hiim, Henrik Stalhane .
INTERNATIONAL SECURITY, 2020, 45 (03) :7-39
[12]  
Congressional Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States, 2023, America's Strategic Posture: The Final Report of the Congressional Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States', P48
[13]  
Fayet Futter, FORUM EUROPEAN NUCL, P83
[14]   Forum: Towards a European Nuclear Deterrent [J].
Fayet, Heloise ;
Futter, Andrew ;
Kuehn, Ulrich .
SURVIVAL, 2024, 66 (05) :67-98
[15]   The naval intelligence underpinnings of reagan's maritime strategy [J].
Ford, CA ;
Rosenberg, DA .
JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC STUDIES, 2005, 28 (02) :379-409
[16]  
Hsakou Adam, 2024, German Marshall Fund, 13 November
[17]  
Hulverscheidt Claus, 2024, Suddeutsche Zeitung,13 November
[18]  
Kacprzyk Artur, 2024, PISM Bulletin, V56
[19]   Escaping Paralysis: Strategies for Countering Asymmetric Nuclear Escalation [J].
Larsen, Even Hellan .
SECURITY STUDIES, 2024, 33 (03) :439-475
[20]  
Lubkemeier Eckhard, 2024, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung,16 February