R&D tax allowance and voluntary information disclosures

被引:0
作者
Bialek-Jaworska, Anna [1 ]
Budlewska, Renata [2 ]
Halatek, Eliza [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warsaw, Fac Econ Sci, Innovat & Dev Dept, Warsaw, Poland
[2] Univ Warsaw, Fac Econ Sci, Minist Finance, Warsaw, Poland
来源
ZESZYTY TEORETYCZNE RACHUNKOWOSCI | 2024年 / 48卷 / 02期
关键词
R&D; disclosure; innovation; tax allowance; patent applications; AGENCY COSTS; INVESTMENT; LIQUIDITY;
D O I
10.5604/01.3001.0054.6237
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Purpose: This paper examines whether the R&D tax allowance in force in Poland since 2016 has increased the voluntary disclosure of information on innovation, R&D, and strategic plans in the management commentary of companies listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange (WSE). Methodology/approach: First, the Tobit model was used to examine the determinants of recognising development works in a sample of 29,288 observations from 3,406 firms. Second, it uses logit and generalised least squares (GLS) methods to analyse 556 management commentaries from 97 public companies that benefited from the R&D tax allowance between 2016 and 2021. Findings: We show that tax relief increases the probability of recognising development work and disclosing information about patents to signal innovativeness and engagement in R&D. Indebted companies disclose more R&D information and strategic plans. IFRS and advanced management increase disclosures, as opposed to tax planning that uses tax havens or that is supported by more advisors. Companies audited by the Big 4 provide fewer details on R&D outcomes and strategic plans. Research limitations/implications: Extending the sample requires collecting disclosure data based on the wording in management commentaries using text-mining tools. Originality/value: The paper contributes to the literature by identifying that R&D tax allowance influences voluntary R&D information disclosure in management commentaries, especially by smaller companies in debt with larger intangible assets.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 36
页数:28
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Is Intellectual Property Beneficial to Knowledge Management? Literature Review on Organizational Knowledge Protection [J].
Ali, Shoaib ;
Tang, Heng .
JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2023, 14 (04) :4100-4118
[2]   Towards a comprehensive theoretical framework for voluntary IC disclosure [J].
An, Yi ;
Davey, Howard ;
Eggleton, Ian R. C. .
JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, 2011, 12 (04) :571-+
[3]   Knowledge Spillovers and Corporate Investment in Scientific Research [J].
Arora, Ashish ;
Belenzon, Sharon ;
Sheer, Lia .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2021, 111 (03) :871-898
[4]  
Arrow K.J., 1962, The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, V12, P609
[5]   Shaping Liquidity: On the Causal Effects of Voluntary Disclosure [J].
Balakrishnan, Karthik ;
Billings, Mary Brooke ;
Kelly, Bryan ;
Ljungqvist, Alexander .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2014, 69 (05) :2237-2278
[6]  
BALLESTER Marta., 2003, EUR ACCOUNT REV, Vn˚12, P605, DOI DOI 10.1080/09638180310001628437
[7]   Analyst coverage and intangible assets [J].
Barth, ME ;
Kasznik, R ;
McNichols, MF .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2001, 39 (01) :1-34
[8]   Segment profitability and the proprietary and agency costs of disclosure [J].
Berger, Philip G. ;
Hann, Rebecca N. .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2007, 82 (04) :869-906
[9]  
Bialek-Jaworska A., 2017, Global Business and Economics Review, V19, P157, DOI [10.1504/gber.2017.10002785, DOI 10.1504/GBER.2017.10002785]
[10]  
Bialek-Jaworska A., 2019, Central European Economic Journal, V6, P262, DOI [10.2478/ceej-2019-0017, DOI 10.2478/CEEJ-2019-0017]