Holistic Comparison of Hydrothermal Carbonization versus Slow Pyrolysis for Biochar Production: Techno-economic Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment

被引:0
作者
Li, Qianben [1 ]
Jin, Qiang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Engn Res Ctr Solid Waste Treatment & Reso, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
hydrothermal carbonization; slow pyrolysis; biochar; techno-economic assessment; life cycleanalysis; CORN STOVER; BIOMASS; HYDROCHAR; SYSTEMS; FUEL; TORREFACTION; PERFORMANCE; COMBUSTION; SIMULATION; CONVERSION;
D O I
10.1021/acssuschemeng.5c02249
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Biochar has emerged as a promising sustainable alternative to fossil fuels. Among various production technologies, hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) and slow pyrolysis (SP) have become particularly critical due to their distinct process advantages and scalability. This study holistically compares the economic viability and environmental sustainability of these two biochar production processes. The performance of both processes in producing biochar is evaluated through life cycle assessment (LCA) and techno-economic analysis (TEA). The results reveal that the minimum price of biochar produced by HTC is 0.0063 USD/MJ, which is 23.2% lower than that of the SP process. While the cradle-to-gate LCA shows that HTC performs worse in certain environmental impact categories, its overall environmental burden remains markedly lower compared to SP. Sensitivity analysis further investigates the influence of various economic and process-related factors on the minimum price and environmental impact. Uncertainty analysis indicates a 71.8% probability that HTC will be the environmentally preferred option, with 30% lower price variability compared to SP. HTC demonstrates superior economic and environmental sustainability in the production of biochar. This study aids decision-makers in selecting the optimal biochar production technology, considering both economic and environmental factors.
引用
收藏
页码:12382 / 12395
页数:14
相关论文
共 66 条
[41]  
Morgan M., 1990, UNCERTAINTY GUIDETO
[42]   Bio-oil and bio-char production from corn cobs and stover by fast pyrolysis [J].
Mullen, Charles A. ;
Boateng, Akwasi A. ;
Goldberg, Neil M. ;
Lima, Isabel M. ;
Laird, David A. ;
Hicks, Kevin B. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2010, 34 (01) :67-74
[43]   Simulation of biomass gasification in fluidized bed reactor using ASPEN PLUS [J].
Nikoo, Mehrdokht B. ;
Mahinpey, Nader .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2008, 32 (12) :1245-1254
[44]   Techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment of olive and wine industry co-products valorisation [J].
Ramos, Joao S. ;
Ferreira, Ana F. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 155
[45]   Life Cycle Assessment of Biochar Systems: Estimating the Energetic, Economic, and Climate Change Potential [J].
Roberts, Kelli G. ;
Gloy, Brent A. ;
Joseph, Stephen ;
Scott, Norman R. ;
Lehmann, Johannes .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (02) :827-833
[46]   Performance analysis of sustainable technologies for biochar production: A comprehensive review [J].
Safarian, Sahar .
ENERGY REPORTS, 2023, 9 :4574-4593
[47]   Parametric influence of process conditions on thermochemical techniques for biochar production: A state-of-the-art review [J].
Sharma, Tanima ;
Hakeem, Ibrahim Gbolahan ;
Gupta, Akhilendra Bhushan ;
Joshi, Jyeshtharaj ;
Shah, Kalpit ;
Vuppaladadiyam, Arun Krishna ;
Sharma, Abhishek .
JOURNAL OF THE ENERGY INSTITUTE, 2024, 113
[48]   Biomass utilization and production of biofuels from carbon neutral materials [J].
Srivastava, Rajesh K. ;
Shetti, Nagaraj P. ;
Reddy, Kakarla Raghava ;
Kwon, Eilhann E. ;
Nadagouda, Mallikarjuna N. ;
Aminabhavi, Tejraj M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2021, 276
[49]  
TechnicalCommittee ISO/TC207, 2006, 207 ISOTC
[50]  
Trading Economics, TRADING EC DATABASE