Holistic Comparison of Hydrothermal Carbonization versus Slow Pyrolysis for Biochar Production: Techno-economic Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment

被引:0
作者
Li, Qianben [1 ]
Jin, Qiang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Engn Res Ctr Solid Waste Treatment & Reso, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
hydrothermal carbonization; slow pyrolysis; biochar; techno-economic assessment; life cycleanalysis; CORN STOVER; BIOMASS; HYDROCHAR; SYSTEMS; FUEL; TORREFACTION; PERFORMANCE; COMBUSTION; SIMULATION; CONVERSION;
D O I
10.1021/acssuschemeng.5c02249
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Biochar has emerged as a promising sustainable alternative to fossil fuels. Among various production technologies, hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) and slow pyrolysis (SP) have become particularly critical due to their distinct process advantages and scalability. This study holistically compares the economic viability and environmental sustainability of these two biochar production processes. The performance of both processes in producing biochar is evaluated through life cycle assessment (LCA) and techno-economic analysis (TEA). The results reveal that the minimum price of biochar produced by HTC is 0.0063 USD/MJ, which is 23.2% lower than that of the SP process. While the cradle-to-gate LCA shows that HTC performs worse in certain environmental impact categories, its overall environmental burden remains markedly lower compared to SP. Sensitivity analysis further investigates the influence of various economic and process-related factors on the minimum price and environmental impact. Uncertainty analysis indicates a 71.8% probability that HTC will be the environmentally preferred option, with 30% lower price variability compared to SP. HTC demonstrates superior economic and environmental sustainability in the production of biochar. This study aids decision-makers in selecting the optimal biochar production technology, considering both economic and environmental factors.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Review of methodological choices in LCA of biorefinery systems - key issues and recommendations [J].
Ahlgren, Serina ;
Bjorklund, Anna ;
Ekman, Anna ;
Karlsson, Hanna ;
Berlin, Johanna ;
Borjesson, Pal ;
Ekvall, Tomas ;
Finnveden, Goran ;
Janssen, Matty ;
Strid, Ingrid .
BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2015, 9 (05) :606-619
[2]   Insight into biochar properties and its cost analysis [J].
Ahmed, Mohammad Boshir ;
Zhou, John L. ;
Ngo, Huu Hao ;
Guo, Wenshan .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2016, 84 :76-86
[3]   Comparison of slow and fast pyrolysis for converting biomass into fuel [J].
Al Arni, Saleh .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2018, 124 :197-201
[4]  
[Anonymous], Mysteel Industry Data Platform
[5]  
[Anonymous], ShanghaiEnvironment and Energy Exchange (SEEE)
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Environmental Management: Life Cycle Assessment Requirements and Guidelines
[7]   Trends in renewable energy production employing biomass-based biochar [J].
Bhatia, Shashi Kant ;
Palai, Akshaya K. ;
Kumar, Amit ;
Bhatia, Ravi Kant ;
Patel, Anil Kumar ;
Thakur, Vijay Kumar ;
Yang, Yung-Hun .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 340
[8]   Life Cycle Assessment and Technoeconomic Analysis of Thermochemical Conversion Technologies Applied to Poultry Litter with Energy and Nutrient Recovery [J].
Bora, Raaj R. ;
Lei, Musuizi ;
Tester, Jefferson W. ;
Lehmann, Johannes ;
You, Fengqi .
ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2020, 8 (22) :8436-8447
[9]   Sensitivity analysis: A review of recent advances [J].
Borgonovo, Emanuele ;
Plischke, Elmar .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 248 (03) :869-887
[10]   Torrefaction of reed canary grass, wheat straw and willow to enhance solid fuel qualities and combustion properties [J].
Bridgeman, T. G. ;
Jones, J. M. ;
Shield, I. ;
Williams, P. T. .
FUEL, 2008, 87 (06) :844-856