Fostering student climate agency and future literacy: a case study of scenario-based teaching

被引:0
作者
Ioannidou, Olga [1 ]
Guilfoyle, Liam [2 ]
Erduran, Sibel [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Educ, Belfield Campus,D4, Dublin D04 V1W8, Ireland
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Educ, Oxford, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Futures thinking; informal learning; climate change; teaching methods; KNOWLEDGE; EMOTIONS; INTERVIEWS;
D O I
10.1080/02635143.2025.2533182
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe 21st century has been characterised by fast-paced global societal, scientific and technological challenges. As such, future citizens should be adequately equipped with necessary skills to navigate the high degree of uncertainty that they entail.PurposesUtilising the affordances of learning in informal spaces, this study explores the use of a scenario-based teaching approach to facilitate students' agency towards climate change.SampleTwenty-four (n = 24) secondary school students (Year 12) took part in the study.Design and methodsA teaching session focusing on possible positive, as well as troubled climate change scenarios, was designed and delivered in a Museum of Natural History in England. Students responded to a paper-pencil questionnaire before and after the teaching session to examine potential gains in their feeling of agency, futures literacy and epistemic emotions.ResultsResults indicated a positive effect on students' climate agency, as well as a significant improvement of students' perceived futures literacy. Moreover, students reported that they felt 'motivated' and 'hopeful' during the session.ConclusionThe findings of the study highlight the pedagogical value of scenario-based teaching as a strategy that can support student agency and confidence in dealing with uncertainties. As a result, it offers valuable insights on effective teaching strategies aiming at students' empowerment towards the complex challenges of the future.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Ananiadou K., 2009, OECD Working Papers
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, PISA 2018 ASSESSMENT, DOI [DOI 10.1787/B25EFAB8-EN, 10.1787/b25efab8-en]
[3]   Environmental education and K-12 student outcomes: A review and analysis of research [J].
Ardoin, Nicole M. ;
Bowers, Alison W. ;
Roth, Noelle Wyman ;
Holthuis, Nicole .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION, 2018, 49 (01) :1-17
[4]   Making sense of youth futures narratives: Recognition of emerging tensions in students' imagination of the future [J].
Barelli, Eleonora ;
Tasquier, Giulia ;
Caramaschi, Martina ;
Satanassi, Sara ;
Fantini, Paola ;
Branchetti, Laura ;
Levrini, Olivia .
FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2022, 7
[5]   Assessing futures literacy as an academic competence for the deployment of foresight competencies [J].
Benavides Rincon, Guillermina ;
Diaz-Dominguez, Alejandro .
FUTURES, 2022, 135
[6]  
Bianchi G., 2022, GreenComp - The European sustainability competence framework, DOI DOI 10.2760/13286
[7]   Backcasting in futures studies: a synthesized scholarly and planning approach to strategic smart sustainable city development [J].
Bibri, Simon Elias .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FUTURES RESEARCH, 2018, 6 (01)
[8]   Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher [J].
Braun, Virginia ;
Clarke, Victoria .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRANSGENDER HEALTH, 2023, 24 (01) :1-6
[9]   Future-Oriented Science Learning and its Effects on Students' Emotions, Futures Literacy and Agency in the Anthropocene [J].
Chan, Jessica ;
Erduran, Sibel .
RESEARCH IN SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2025, 55 (04) :899-919
[10]  
Chapman R., 2015, Time of Useful Consciousness: Acting Urgently on Climate Change, V32, DOI [https://doi.org/10.7810/9780908321414, DOI 10.7810/9780908321414]