Effect of synthetic jet parameters on controlled flow over an airfoil

被引:2
作者
Parthasarathy T. [1 ]
Das S.P. [2 ]
机构
[1] University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, 61820, IL
[2] Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai
关键词
Flow control; Jet–cross-flow interaction; Synthetic jet; Unsteady aerodynamics; Vortex dynamics;
D O I
10.1615/InterJFluidMechRes.2017018329
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Flow control for performance enhancement over airfoils (both stall and load enhancement) has become an increasingly important topic. This numerical work describes the characteristics of flow control using synthetic jets over a NACA 0015 airfoil at a Reynolds number of 8.96 × 105 (based on the chord length and free-stream velocity) and at 20° angle of attack (wherein the flow is separated). A range of synthetic jet parameters were chosen to visualize their effects on the controlled flow. Analysis of key flow parameters indicate that the synthetic jet is efficient in increasing the lift coefficient while simultaneously reducing the drag coefficient, more so for larger jet amplitudes and at smaller angles of jet injection. A regression model for predicting the flow parameters is also specified. Toward the end of the study, a new parameter—the differential time of suction and blowing—was identified and its effect on the flow dynamics was observed. While the time modulation offers some benefits, it is the opinion of the authors that the benefits are too marginal to justify the implementation of such a system. This work serves as a platform to qualitatively and quantitatively understand the effects of the jet parameters on the separated flow over the airfoil, by understanding the flow parameters and structures. © 2017 by Begell House, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 408
页数:21
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Akcayoz E., Tuncer I.H., Numerical investigation of flow control over an airfoil using synthetic jets and its optimization, Ankara International Aerospace Conf., (2009)
[2]  
Collis S.S., Joslin R.D., Seifert A., Theofilis V., Issues in active flow control: Theory, control, simulation, and experiment, Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 40, 2, pp. 237-289, (2004)
[3]  
Dannenberg R.E., Weiberg J.A., Section characteristics of a 10.5-percent-thick airfoil with area suction as affected by chord-wise distribution of permeability, NASA Tech. Rep., (1952)
[4]  
De Giorgi M.G., De Luca C.G., Ficarella A., Marra F., Comparison between synthetic jets and continuous jets for active flow control: Application on a NACA 0015 and a compressor stator cascade, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 43, pp. 256-280, (2015)
[5]  
Donovan J., Kral L., Cary A., Active flow control applied to an airfoil, 36th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, (1998)
[6]  
Drela M., XFOIL: An analysis and design system for low reynolds number airfoils, Low Reynolds Number Aerodynamics, pp. 1-12, (1989)
[7]  
Duvigneau R., Visonneau M., Simulation and optimization of stall control for an airfoil with synthetic jet, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 10, 4, pp. 279-287, (2006)
[8]  
Feng L.H., Wang J.J., The virtual aeroshaping enhancement by synthetic jets with variable suction and blowing cycles, Phys. Fluids, 26, 1, (2014)
[9]  
Gilarranz J.L., Traub L.W., Rediniotis O.K., A new class of synthetic jet actuators-Part II: Application to flow separation control, ASME J. Fluids Eng., 127, 2, pp. 377-387, (2005)
[10]  
Glezer A., Amitay M., Synthetic jets, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 34, 1, pp. 503-529, (2002)