Unveiling the power of features: A comparative study of machine learning and deep learning for modulation recognition

被引:0
作者
Leblebici, Merih [1 ]
Çalhan, Ali [2 ]
Cicioğlu, Murtaza [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Duzce University, Duzce
[2] Department of Computer Engineering, Duzce University, Duzce
[3] Department of Computer Engineering, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Machine learning; Modulation recognition; Wireless communication;
D O I
10.1016/j.phycom.2025.102791
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Wireless communication systems rely on amplitude, frequency, and phase parameters for signal transmission. Traditional modulation recognition (MR) techniques, employing likelihood-based (LB) and feature-based (FB) methods, struggle with accurate classification, particularly at low signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) and increasing modulation complexity. Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms, which efficiently utilize in-phase/quadrature (IQ) and r-radius/θ-angle (rθ) data representations to enhance MR performance. DL, utilizing artificial neural networks (ANN), minimizes the need for extensive feature engineering, making it adept at handling diverse modulation types and challenging SNR conditions. This study systematically examines dataset generation parameters to reveal their impact on MR performance. By focusing on these underlying parameters, the analysis provides deeper insights into how data characteristics influence model performance, offering a foundational understanding for optimizing dataset configurations in MR tasks. Evaluating ML and DL models across datasets, results show DL model consistently outperforms ML models, achieving up to 79.41 % accuracy on IQ-based datasets. DL's hierarchical feature extraction enhances adaptability, particularly with larger datasets, reduced window lengths (WL), and specific θ ranges (e.g., radians or smaller degree intervals). For ML models, datasets based on IQ, rθ, and IQrθ parameters yield better results but remain below 70 % accuracy. Overall, DL model exhibits robust adaptability to complex signal environments, highlighting their effectiveness in advancing modulation recognition for next-generation wireless communication systems. © 2025 Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Dulek B., Online hybrid likelihood based modulation classification using multiple sensors, IEEe Trans. Wirel. Commun., 16, pp. 4984-5000, (2017)
[2]  
Zhang F., Luo C., Xu J., Luo Y., Zheng F.C., Deep learning based automatic modulation recognition: models, datasets, and challenges, Digit. Signal Process.: Rev. J., 129, (2022)
[3]  
Zhang H., Zhou F., Wu Q., Wu W., Hu R.Q., A novel automatic modulation classification scheme based on multi-scale networks, IEEe Trans. Cogn. Commun. Netw., 8, pp. 97-110, (2022)
[4]  
O'Shea T.J., Corgan J., Clancy T.C., Convolutional radio modulation recognition networks, Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci., 629, pp. 213-226, (2016)
[5]  
O'Shea T.J., Roy T., Clancy T.C., Over-the-air deep learning based radio signal classification, IEEe J. Sel. Top. Signal. Process., 12, pp. 168-179, (2018)
[6]  
Wang Y., Liu M., Yang J., Gui G., Data-driven deep learning for automatic modulation recognition in cognitive radios, IEEe Trans. Veh. Technol., 68, pp. 4074-4077, (2019)
[7]  
Zhou R., Liu F., Gravelle C.W., Deep Learning for modulation recognition: a survey with a demonstration, IEEe Access., 8, pp. 67366-67376, (2020)
[8]  
Jdid B., Hassan K., Dayoub I., Lim W.H., Mokayef M., Machine learning based automatic modulation recognition for Wireless communications: a comprehensive survey, IEEe Access., 9, pp. 57851-57873, (2021)
[9]  
Huynh-The T., Pham Q.V., Van Nguyen T., Nguyen T.T., Ruby R., Zeng M., Kim D.S., Automatic modulation classification: a deep architecture survey, IEEe Access., 9, pp. 142950-142971, (2021)
[10]  
Zhang F., Luo C., Xu J., Luo Y., An efficient deep learning model for automatic modulation recognition based on parameter estimation and transformation, IEEe Commun. Lett., 25, pp. 3287-3290, (2021)