Which sectors should be involved in public health emergency preparedness, response, and recovery decision-making? A RAND-modified consensus procedure among European Union country experts

被引:0
作者
Kamga, L. S. Kengne [1 ,2 ]
Voordouw, A. C. G. [1 ]
De Vries, M. C. [1 ]
Koopmans, M. P. G. [3 ,4 ]
Timen, A. [2 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm, Ctr Infect Dis Control, Postbus 1, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Athena Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] ErasmusMC, Erasmus Med Ctr, Dept Virosci, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Pandem & Disaster Preparedness Ctr, Delft, Netherlands
[5] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm, Ctr Infect Dis Control, Bilthoven, Netherlands
[6] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Primary & Community Care, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Decision-making; Preparedness; Consensus; Response; Recovery; Public health emergency;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-025-23557-8
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated the imperative for multisectoral collaboration and a whole-of-society approach to managing public health emergencies (PHE). However, there are currently no guidelines available on which sectors should be included in public health emergency preparedness and response (PHEPR). There is also a lack of guidance on how to encourage multisectoral collaboration during emergencies. This study gathers insights from European experts to identify key sectors for PHE preparedness, response, and recovery.MethodsA multi-stage Delphi study was conducted with European PHE experts to compile (i) a consensus-driven list of priority sectors for PHE decision-making, and (ii) a list of recommendations on how to incorporate multisectoral collaboration in PHEPR plans.ResultsOf the 28 predefined sectors, consensus was reached among experts on 12 sectors that should be included in decision-making during preparedness, response, and recovery. One additional sector was identified as relevant during the response phase. Furthermore, consensus was reached for ten suggested recommendations on how to incorporate multisectoral collaboration in national PHEPR plans.ConclusionsThis study provides the collective opinion of European PHE experts on a list of 13 sectors that should be included in decision-making during PHE preparedness, response, and/or recovery. It also provides ten recommendations on how to improve multisectoral collaboration. These can be used as systematic checklists when PHEPR experts consider how to integrate different sectors and multisectoral collaboration in PHE management.Trial registrationNot applicable.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
1ka, OneClickSurvey
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, OFFICIAL J EUROPEAN, V352, P22
[3]  
[Anonymous], List of sectors of economic activities for the development of ESCO v1
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Pandemic influenza preparedness and response
[5]   Collaborative governance in theory and practice [J].
Ansell, Chris ;
Gash, Alison .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2008, 18 (04) :543-571
[6]   Identifying essential resource parameters for pandemic preparedness and response: an international Delphi study within the EU PANDEM-2 project [J].
Beishuizen, Berend H. H. ;
Stein, Mart L. ;
Buis, Joeri S. ;
Tostmann, Alma ;
Green, Caroline ;
Duggan, James ;
Connolly, Maire A. ;
Rovers, Chantal P. ;
Timen, Aura .
BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (12) :e079609
[7]   Towards defining core principles of public health emergency preparedness: scoping review and Delphi consultation among European Union country experts [J].
Belfroid, Evelien ;
Rosskamp, Dorothee ;
Fraser, Graham ;
Swaan, Corien ;
Timen, Aura .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 20 (01)
[8]   Hiding in Plain Sight: Conceptualizing the Creeping Crisis [J].
Boin, Arjen ;
Ekengren, Magnus ;
Rhinard, Mark .
RISK HAZARDS & CRISIS IN PUBLIC POLICY, 2020, 11 (02) :116-138
[9]   Transformation of the Food Sector: Security and Resilience during the COVID-19 Pandemic [J].
Boyaci-Gunduz, Cennet Pelin ;
Ibrahim, Salam A. ;
Wei, Ooi Chien ;
Galanakis, Charis M. .
FOODS, 2021, 10 (03)
[10]  
Cerrillo-i-Martinez A., 2017, Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance