An instructional design framework to improve student learning in a first-year engineering class

被引:0
作者
Yelamarthi K. [1 ]
Drake E. [2 ]
Prewett M. [3 ]
机构
[1] School of Engineering and Technology, Central Michigan University, Mt Pleasant, MI
[2] College of Medicine, Central Michigan University, Mt Pleasant, MI
[3] Department of Psychology, Central Michigan University, Mt Pleasant, MI
关键词
Collaborative learning; Flipped classroom; Instructional design; Interactive learning environments;
D O I
10.28945/3617
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Increasingly, numerous universities have identified benefits of flipped learning environments and have been encouraging instructors to adapt such methodologies in their respective classrooms, at a time when departments are facing significant budget constraints. This article proposes an in-structional design framework utilized to strategically enhance traditional flipped methodologies in a first-year engineering course, by using low-cost technology aids and proven pedagogical tech-niques to enhance student learning. Implemented in a first-year engineering course, this modified flipped model demonstrated an improved student awareness of essential engineering concepts and improved academic performance through collaborative and active learning activities, including flipped learning methodologies, without the need for expensive, formal active learning spaces. These findings have been validated through two studies and have shown similar results confirm-ing that student learning is improved by the implementation of multi-pedagogical strategies in-formed by the use of an instructional design in a traditional classroom setting. © Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 2016.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 222
页数:27
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Baepler P., Walker J.D., Driessen M., It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficien-cy in active learning classrooms, Computers & Education, 78, pp. 227-236, (2014)
[2]  
Bain K., What the best college teachers do, (2004)
[3]  
Berrett D., How 'flipping' the classroom can improve the traditional lecture, The Chronicle of Higher Education, (2012)
[4]  
Bishop J.L., Verleger M.A., The flipped classroom: A survey of the research, Proceedings of 120th American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, (2013)
[5]  
Canfield S., Ghafoor G., Abdelrahman M., Enhancing the programming experience for first-year engineering students through hands-on integrated computer experiences, Journal of STEM Educa-tion, 13, 4, pp. 43-54, (2012)
[6]  
Cotner S., Loper J., Walker J.D., Brooks D.C., It's not you, it's the room"-Are the high-tech, active learning classrooms worth it?, Journal of College Science Teaching, pp. 82-88, (2013)
[7]  
Dal M., Teaching electric drives control course: Incorporation of active learning into the classroom, IEEE Transactions on Education, 56, 4, pp. 459-469, (2013)
[8]  
Danielson J., Preast V., Bender H., Hassall L., Is the effectiveness of lecture capture related to teaching approach or content type?, Computers & Education, 72, pp. 121-131, (2014)
[9]  
Felder R.M., Engineering education: A tale of two paradigms, Shaking the foundations of geo-engineering education, pp. 9-14, (2012)
[10]  
Finelli C.J., Ott M., Gottfried A.C., Hershock C., O'Neal C., Kaplan M., Utilizing instruc-tional consultations to enhance the teaching performance of engineering faculty, Journal of Engineer-ing Education, 97, 4, pp. 397-412, (2011)