Comparative Performance of Object Detection Algorithms Under Low Illumination Conditions

被引:0
作者
Hossain, Md Junayed [1 ]
Rahman, Shoptorshi [1 ]
Monir, Md Fahad [2 ]
Ahmed, Tarem [1 ]
机构
[1] Independent Univ Bangladesh, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Dhaka, Bangladesh
[2] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
来源
SOUTHEASTCON 2025 | 2025年
关键词
Object detection; gamma correction; histogram equalization; YOLOv5; SIFT; SURF; low illumination;
D O I
10.1109/SOUTHEASTCON56624.2025.10971492
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Real-time object detection is pivotal in various computer vision and robotics applications, such as security surveillance, autonomous navigation, and interactive systems. This study evaluates several object detection algorithms under low illumination conditions, comparing traditional methods including SIFT, SURF, ORB, BRISK, KAZE, and AKAZE with the deep learning model YOLOv5. To simulate these conditions, we utilized the COCO dataset and implemented a sequence of preprocessing procedures, such as adjusting the gamma correction throughout the dataset, introducing Gaussian noise, and equalizing the histogram to improve image contrast. Here, YOLOv5 exhibited superior performance, achieving a detection accuracy of 92.47% and a processing time of 45 milliseconds per image. Traditional algorithms like SURF and KAZE, although slower, demonstrated precision rates of 78.54% and 76.86%, respectively. YOLOv5 also identified the highest number of key points and matches. Our findings indicate that while YOLOv5 excels in real-time detection under low-light conditions, traditional methods are effective for specific tasks in resource-constrained environments. This study benchmarks these algorithms and proposes a hybrid approach to enhance real-time object detection systems under low illumination conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:1085 / 1090
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF) [J].
Bay, Herbert ;
Ess, Andreas ;
Tuytelaars, Tinne ;
Van Gool, Luc .
COMPUTER VISION AND IMAGE UNDERSTANDING, 2008, 110 (03) :346-359
[2]   Iterative Scale-Invariant Feature Transform for Remote Sensing Image Registration [J].
Chen, Shuhan ;
Zhong, Shengwei ;
Xue, Bai ;
Li, Xiaorun ;
Zhao, Liaoying ;
Chang, Chein-I .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 59 (04) :3244-3265
[3]  
Dawar J, 2020, IEEE INT CONF MULTI
[4]   Histogram Equalization Variants as Optimization Problems: A Review [J].
Dhal, Krishna Gopal ;
Das, Arunita ;
Ray, Swarnajit ;
Galvez, Jorge ;
Das, Sanjoy .
ARCHIVES OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2021, 28 (03) :1471-1496
[5]  
Hossain Akik, 2023, 2023 26 INT C COMP I, P1
[6]  
Hsieh C.-H., 2021, Advances in Systems Science and Applications, V21, P95, DOI [10.25728/assa.2021.21.1.1047, DOI 10.25728/ASSA.2021.21.1.1047]
[7]  
Katsamenis Iason, 2022, Novel & Intelligent Digital Systems Conferences, P349
[8]   Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context [J].
Lin, Tsung-Yi ;
Maire, Michael ;
Belongie, Serge ;
Hays, James ;
Perona, Pietro ;
Ramanan, Deva ;
Dollar, Piotr ;
Zitnick, C. Lawrence .
COMPUTER VISION - ECCV 2014, PT V, 2014, 8693 :740-755
[9]   Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints [J].
Lowe, DG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER VISION, 2004, 60 (02) :91-110
[10]   YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Stronger [J].
Redmon, Joseph ;
Farhadi, Ali .
30TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR 2017), 2017, :6517-6525