Quantitative evaluation of actual fault diagnosability for dynamic systems

被引：0

作者：

Li, Wen-Bo ^{[1
,2
]}

Wang, Da-Yi ^{[1
,2
]}

Liu, Cheng-Rui ^{[1
,2
]}

机构：

[1] Beijing Institute of Control Engineering, Beijing

[2] Science and Technology on Space Intelligent Control Laboratory, Beijing

来源：

Zidonghua Xuebao/Acta Automatica Sinica | 2015年 / 41卷 / 03期

基金：

中国国家自然科学基金;

关键词：

Actual fault diagnosability; Directional similarity; Distance similarity; Dynamic systems; Kullback-Leibler divergence; Quantitative evaluation;

D O I：

10.16383/j.aas.2015.c140428

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

This paper proposes a novel approach to quantitative evaluation of actual fault diagnosability for dynamic systems. This approach, which can quantify the difficult level to detect and isolate a fault without designing a diagnosis algorithm, provides a guidance and reference for the technical purpose of improving fault diagnosis ability in the system design phase. First, fault diagnosability evaluation for the dynamic system described by a state space model is converted to a statistical probability problem for distinguishing the similarity of different multivariate distributions through the model standardization and the parity space method. KLD (Kullback-Leibler divergence) is introduced to present the principle of evaluating fault diagnosability based on the criterion of distance similarity, and the shortages of this method are pointed out through rigorous proofs. To make up these shortages, a new method for quantitative diagnosability evaluation is designed, which is derived from the probability distribution of fault vectors and the cosine similarity between two different fault vectors in the view of directional similarity. Finally, the validity and superiority of the proposed approach are verified by numerical simulations. Copyright © 2015 Acta Automatica Sinica. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：497 / 507

页数：10

共 26 条

[1]

Zhou D.-H., Hu Y.-Y., Fault diagnosis techniques for dynamic systems, Acta Automatica Sinica, 35, 6, pp. 748-758, (2009)

[2]

Patton R.J., Uppal F.J., Simani S., Polle B., Robust FDI applied to thruster faults of a satellite system, Control Engineering Practice, 18, 9, pp. 1093-1109, (2010)

[3]

Frank P.M., Fault diagnosis in dynamic systems using analytical and knowledge-based redundancy - a survey and some new results, Automatica, 26, 3, pp. 459-474, (1990)

[4]

Frank P.M., Analytical and qualitative model-based fault diagnosis - a survey and some new results, European Journal of Control, 2, 1, pp. 6-28, (1996)

[5]

Patton R.J., Frank P.M., Clark R.N., Issues of Fault Diagnosis for Dynamic Systems, (2000)

[6]

Marzat J., Piet-Lahanier H., Damongeot F., Walter E., Model-based fault diagnosis for aerospace systems: a survey, Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 226, 10, pp. 1329-1360, (2012)

[7]

IEEE TrialUse Standard for Testability and Diagnosability Characteristics and Metrics

[8]

Chow E.Y., Willsky A.D., Analytical redundancy and the design of robust failure detection systems, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 29, 7, pp. 603-614, (1984)

[9]

Nyberg M., Nielsen L., Parity functions as universal residual generators and tool for fault detectability analysis, Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 4483-4489, (1997)

[10]

Frisk E., Nyberg M., A minimal polynomial basis solution to residual generation for fault diagnosis in linear systems, Automatica, 37, 9, pp. 1417-1424, (2001)

← 1 2 3 →