The Effect of Spatial Reference on Visual Attention and Workload during Viewpoint Guidance in Augmented Reality

被引:10
作者
Markov-Vetter, Daniela [1 ]
Luboschik, Martin [1 ]
Islam, Abm Tariqul [1 ]
Gauger, Peter [2 ]
Staadt, Oliver [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rostock, Rostock, Germany
[2] German Aerosp Ctr, Cologne, Germany
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 ACM SYMPOSIUM ON SPATIAL USER INTERACTION, SUI 2020 | 2020年
关键词
Augmented Reality; viewpoint guidance; workload; visual attention; HEART-RATE-VARIABILITY; STRESS; VISION;
D O I
10.1145/3385959.3418449
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Considering human capability for spatial orientation and navigation, the visualization used to support the localization of off-screen targets inevitably influences the visual-spatial processing that relies on two frameworks. So far it is not proven which frame of reference, egocentric or exocentric, contributes most to efficient viewpoint guidance in a head-mounted Augmented Reality environment. This could be justified by the lack of objectively assessing the allocation of attention and mental workload demanded by the guidance method. This paper presents a user study investigating the effect of egocentric and exocentric viewpoint guidance on visual attention and mental workload. In parallel to a localization task, participants had to complete a divided attention task using the oddball paradigm. During task fulfilment, the heart rate variability was measured to determine the physiological stress level. The objective assessment of mental workload was supplemented by subjective ratings using the NASA TLX. The results show that egocentric viewpoint guidance leads to most efficient target cueing in terms of faster localization, higher accuracy and slower self-reported workload. In addition, egocentric target cueing causes a slight decrease in physiological stress and enables faster recognition of simultaneous events, although visual attention seemed to be covertly oriented.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Integral Review
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, P 8 C HUM COMP INT M, DOI DOI 10.1145/1152215.1152266
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, P SIGCHI C HUM FACT, DOI DOI 10.1145/642611.642695
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Em: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services, DOI [DOI 10.1145/1851600.1851655, 10.1145/1851600.1851655, DOI 10.1145/1851600]
[5]   A survey of augmented reality [J].
Azuma, RT .
PRESENCE-VIRTUAL AND AUGMENTED REALITY, 1997, 6 (04) :355-385
[6]  
Bell B., 2002, P 15 ANN ACM S USER, P213, DOI DOI 10.1145/571985.572017
[7]  
Biocca F., 2006, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI2006, P1115
[8]  
Burigat S., 2012, Em: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services, P93, DOI [10.1145/2371574.2371590, DOI 10.1145/2371574.2371590]
[9]   Visualizing references to off-screen content on mobile devices: A comparison of Arrows, Wedge, and Overview plus Detail [J].
Burigat, Stefano ;
Chittaro, Luca .
INTERACTING WITH COMPUTERS, 2011, 23 (02) :156-166
[10]  
Byers J.C., 1989, Adv. Ind. Ergon. Saf., V1, P481