Hyper-Management: Neoliberal Expansions of Purpose and Leadership

被引:26
作者
Bromley, Patricia [1 ]
Meyer, John W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, 485 Lasuen Mall, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
ORGANIZATION THEORY | 2021年 / 2卷 / 03期
关键词
actorhood; globalization; institutional theory; management expansion; neoliberalism; organizational expansion; world society; TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP; CHANGING NATURE; RESPONSIBILITY; EDUCATION; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; ORGANIZATIONS; COMMITMENT; INNOVATION; SOCIETY; ACTORS;
D O I
10.1177/26317877211020327
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Recent decades have witnessed a discursive expansion of calls for abstract and charismatic management beyond the systematic administration of concrete settings-hyper-management. A first dimension of hyper-management is the lionization of individuals and organizations as empowered purposive actors, embodied in celebrations of vision, innovation, and entrepreneurship. A second dimension is the intended unification of empowered internal and external actors and their diverse purposes, manifest in calls for leadership qualities beyond formal authority such as communication, collaboration, and inspiration. The changes are broad and cultural, cutting across countries and social sectors, and are often decoupled from realistic practice. Thus they are better accounted for by a neo-institutional perspective than by theories emphasizing particular functions and interests. Hyper-management is generated by a culture of global neoliberalism and the ideologies of empowered individual and organizational actorhood that flow from it. During the global hegemony of neoliberal culture, hyper-management has become institutionalized in contemporary education programs, consulting arrangements, and exaggerated managerial status and income. But, given its cultural bases, current and future resistance to neoliberal globalization may undercut it.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 140 条
[1]   Speed of internationalization and entrepreneurial cognition: Insights and a comparison between international new ventures, exporters and domestic firms [J].
Acedo, Francisco J. ;
Jones, Marian V. .
JOURNAL OF WORLD BUSINESS, 2007, 42 (03) :236-252
[2]   Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship [J].
Aghion, P ;
Bloom, N ;
Blundell, R ;
Griffith, R ;
Howitt, P .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2005, 120 (02) :701-728
[3]   Selling Issues with Solutions: Igniting Social Intrapreneurship in for-Profit Organizations [J].
Alt, Elisa ;
Craig, Justin B. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2016, 53 (05) :794-820
[4]   PUBLIC RESPONSIBILITY IN PRIVATE CORPORATION [J].
ANDREWS, KR .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 1972, 20 (02) :135-145
[5]   DESIGN AND DEVOTION - SURGES OF RATIONAL AND NORMATIVE IDEOLOGIES OF CONTROL IN MANAGERIAL DISCOURSE [J].
BARLEY, SR ;
KUNDA, G .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1992, 37 (03) :363-399
[6]  
Bass B. M., 2006, Transformational leadership, V2nd ed.
[7]  
Bass B. M., 1985, Leadership and performance beyond expectations, DOI DOI 10.1002/HRM.3930250310
[8]   FROM TRANSACTIONAL TO TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP - LEARNING TO SHARE THE VISION [J].
BASS, BM .
ORGANIZATIONAL DYNAMICS, 1990, 18 (03) :19-31
[9]  
Battilana J., 2016, Capitalism beyond mutuality? Perspectives integrating philosophy and social science, P256
[10]   Advancing Research on Hybrid Organizing - Insights from the Study of Social Enterprises [J].
Battilana, Julie ;
Lee, Matthew .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2014, 8 (01) :397-441