Development and validation of the digital mindset scale

被引:0
作者
Goldmann, Paul [1 ]
Schaefer, Bjoern [2 ,3 ]
Altendorfer, Christina [2 ]
机构
[1] Zwickau Univ Appl Sci, Kornmarkt 1, D-08056 Zwickau, Germany
[2] Catholic Univ Eichstatt Ingolstadt, Schanz 49, D-85049 Ingolstadt, Germany
[3] Free Univ Bozen Bolzano, Spitalgasse 8, I-39100 Bolzano, Italy
关键词
Digital transformation; Digital mindset; Scale development; Grounded Theory; EXPLORATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; BEHAVIOR; TRANSFORMATION; VALIDITY; RECOMMENDATIONS; CAPABILITIES; DEFINITIONS; ENTERPRISE; PARADIGM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115554
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
An individual's digital mindset is crucial to navigating digital transformation. Current studies reveal a lack of construct clarity jeopardizing further research. We address this gap by conceptualizing the construct and its multidimensionality, and by developing and validating a scale. Following a multi-grounded theory approach (n = 28) we identify three dimensions of digital mindset: digital consciousness, digital expertise, and digital business acumen. Subsequently, we developed and validated the digital mindset scale in five phases. We generated 95 items. Exploratory (n =167) and confirmatory (n = 658) factor analyses supported the dimensions. We added items and reassessed the psychometric properties (n = 152), and established convergent and discriminant validity (n = 243). Finally, we examined relationships with innovative and entrepreneurial behavior, supporting nomological and incremental validity (n = 145). Our research paves the way for empirical studies and equips practitioners to assess employees' digital mindset throughout the professional lifecycle.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 66 条
[51]  
Patton M Q., 2002, Qualitative research and evaluation methods, V3rd
[52]   Effects of managers' entrepreneurial behavior on subordinates [J].
Pearce, JA ;
Kramer, TR ;
Robbins, DK .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 1997, 12 (02) :147-160
[53]   Recommendations for Creating Better Concept Definitions in the Organizational, Behavioral, and Social Sciences [J].
Podsakoff, Philip M. ;
MacKenzie, Scott B. ;
Podsakoff, Nathan P. .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2016, 19 (02) :159-203
[54]  
RHINESMITH SH, 1992, TRAINING DEV, V46, P63
[55]  
Rubin H J., 2012, Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data, V3rd
[56]   Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research [J].
Rubio, DM ;
Berg-Weger, M ;
Tebb, SS ;
Lee, ES ;
Rauch, S .
SOCIAL WORK RESEARCH, 2003, 27 (02) :94-104
[57]   Performance-based rewards and innovative behaviors [J].
Sanders, Karin ;
Jorgensen, Frances ;
Shipton, Helen ;
Van Rossenberg, Yvonne ;
Cunha, Rita ;
Li, Xiaobei ;
Rodrigues, Ricardo ;
Wong, Sut I. ;
Dysvik, Anders .
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2018, 57 (06) :1455-1468
[58]   Shedding Light on Leaders' Self-Interest: Theory and Measurement of Exploitative Leadership [J].
Schmid, Ellen Anke ;
Verdorfer, Armin Pircher ;
Peus, Claudia .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2019, 45 (04) :1401-1433
[59]  
Schwab D.P., 1980, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V2, P3, DOI DOI 10.4236/PSYCH.2015.612144
[60]  
SCOTT SG, 1994, ACAD MANAGE J, V37, P580, DOI 10.5465/256701