Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning Regressors for the Layer Geometry Prediction in Wire arc Additive manufacturing

被引:9
作者
Barrionuevo, German Omar [1 ]
Rios, Sergio [2 ,3 ]
Williams, Stewart W. [3 ]
Ramos-Grez, Jorge Andres [1 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Sch Engn, Dept Mech & Met Engn, Ave Vicuna Mackenna 4860, Santiago 4860, Chile
[2] Univ Magallanes, Dept Mech Engn, Manuel Bulnes 01855, Punta Arenas, Region De Magal, Chile
[3] Cranfield Univ, Welding Engn & Laser Proc Ctr, Univ Way, Cranfield, Beds, England
来源
2021 IEEE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHANICAL AND INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGIES, ICMIMT | 2021年
关键词
Wire arc additive manufacturing; Machine learning; Layer geometry prediction; Boosting regressors; BEAD GEOMETRY; PROCESS MODEL;
D O I
10.1109/ICMIMT52186.2021.9476168
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In this paper, a set of the most employed machine learning (ML) algorithms were trained and tested to assess which ones present the highest accuracy in predicting the layer geometry of the Ti-6Al-4V processed by plasma transfer arc deposition. Wire and arc additive manufacturing brings about the possibility of manufacturing large and robust components based on metal wires. One of the critical aspects to take into account during the manufacturing process is the layer geometry. Bead geometry depends on several processing parameters, e.g., arc voltage, welding current, travel speed, wire feed speed, and gas flow rate. The algorithms that better adjusted the prediction were multilayer perceptron with five hidden layers, linear support vector regression, and boosting regressors, which combine multiple models to reduce overfitting risk.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 190
页数:5
相关论文
共 32 条
[11]   A 3D dynamic analysis of different depositing processes used in wire arc additive manufacturing [J].
Huang, Jiankang ;
Guan, Zhichen ;
Yu, Shurong ;
Yu, Xiaoquan ;
Yuan, Wen ;
Li, Nan ;
Fan, Ding .
MATERIALS TODAY COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 24
[12]   Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing of Stainless Steels: A Review [J].
Jin, Wanwan ;
Zhang, Chaoqun ;
Jin, Shuoya ;
Tian, Yingtao ;
Wellmann, Daniel ;
Liu, Wen .
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (05)
[13]   Intelligent process model for bead geometry prediction in WAAM [J].
Karmuhilan, M. ;
Sood, Anoop Kumar .
MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2018, 5 (11) :24005-24013
[14]   Semi-supervised regression: A recent review [J].
Kostopoulos, Georgios ;
Karlos, Stamatis ;
Kotsiantis, Sotiris ;
Ragos, Omiros .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2018, 35 (02) :1483-1500
[15]   Review of Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing for 3D Metal Printing [J].
Li, Johnnie Liew Zhong ;
Alkahari, Mohd Rizal ;
Rosli, Nor Ana Binti ;
Hasan, Rafidah ;
Sudin, Mohd Nizam ;
Ramli, Faiz Redza .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 13 (03) :346-353
[16]   Enhanced beads overlapping model for wire and arc additive manufacturing of multi-layer multi-bead metallic parts [J].
Li, Yongzhe ;
Sun, Yunfei ;
Han, Qinglin ;
Zhang, Guangjun ;
Horvath, Imre .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 252 :838-848
[17]   Wire and arc additive manufacturing of metal components: a review of recent research developments [J].
Liu, Jienan ;
Xu, Yanling ;
Ge, Yu ;
Hou, Zhen ;
Chen, Shanben .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 111 (1-2) :149-198
[18]   Interpass rolling of Ti-6Al-4V wire + arc additively manufactured features for microstructural refinement [J].
McAndrew, Anthony R. ;
Rosales, Marta Alvarez ;
Colegrove, Paul A. ;
Honnige, Jan R. ;
Ho, Alistair ;
Fayolle, Romain ;
Eyitayo, Kamal ;
Stan, Ioan ;
Sukrongpang, Punyawee ;
Crochemore, Antoine ;
Pinter, Zsolt .
ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2018, 21 :340-349
[19]   Continuous Eulerian tool path strategies for wire-arc additive manufacturing of rib-web structures with machine-learning-based adaptive void filling [J].
Nguyen, Lam ;
Buhl, Johannes ;
Bambach, Markus .
ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2020, 35
[20]  
Pandala S.R., GitHub-shankarpandala/lazypredict: Lazy Predict