Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning Regressors for the Layer Geometry Prediction in Wire arc Additive manufacturing

被引:9
作者
Barrionuevo, German Omar [1 ]
Rios, Sergio [2 ,3 ]
Williams, Stewart W. [3 ]
Ramos-Grez, Jorge Andres [1 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Sch Engn, Dept Mech & Met Engn, Ave Vicuna Mackenna 4860, Santiago 4860, Chile
[2] Univ Magallanes, Dept Mech Engn, Manuel Bulnes 01855, Punta Arenas, Region De Magal, Chile
[3] Cranfield Univ, Welding Engn & Laser Proc Ctr, Univ Way, Cranfield, Beds, England
来源
2021 IEEE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHANICAL AND INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGIES, ICMIMT | 2021年
关键词
Wire arc additive manufacturing; Machine learning; Layer geometry prediction; Boosting regressors; BEAD GEOMETRY; PROCESS MODEL;
D O I
10.1109/ICMIMT52186.2021.9476168
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In this paper, a set of the most employed machine learning (ML) algorithms were trained and tested to assess which ones present the highest accuracy in predicting the layer geometry of the Ti-6Al-4V processed by plasma transfer arc deposition. Wire and arc additive manufacturing brings about the possibility of manufacturing large and robust components based on metal wires. One of the critical aspects to take into account during the manufacturing process is the layer geometry. Bead geometry depends on several processing parameters, e.g., arc voltage, welding current, travel speed, wire feed speed, and gas flow rate. The algorithms that better adjusted the prediction were multilayer perceptron with five hidden layers, linear support vector regression, and boosting regressors, which combine multiple models to reduce overfitting risk.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 190
页数:5
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Comparative evaluation of supervised machine learning algorithms in the prediction of the relative density of 316L stainless steel fabricated by selective laser melting [J].
Barrionuevo, German Omar ;
Ramos-Grez, Jorge Andres ;
Walczak, Magdalena ;
Betancourt, Carlos Andres .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 113 (1-2) :419-433
[2]   Prediction of geometry deviations in additive manufactured parts: comparison of linear regression with machine learning algorithms [J].
Baturynska, Ivanna ;
Martinsen, Kristian .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2021, 32 (01) :179-200
[3]  
Chelly SM, 2001, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V33, P326
[4]  
Deng J, 2019, BEAD GEOMETRY PREDIC, P125, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-8668-8_7
[5]   Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM) process of nickel based superalloys - A review [J].
Dhinakaran, V. ;
Ajith, J. ;
Fahmidha, A. Fathima Yasin ;
Jagadeesha, T. ;
Sathish, T. ;
Stalin, B. .
MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2020, 21 :920-925
[6]   Bead modelling and implementation of adaptive MAT path in wire and arc additive manufacturing [J].
Ding, Donghong ;
Pan, Zengxi ;
Cuiuri, Dominic ;
Li, Huijun ;
van Duin, Stephen ;
Larkin, Nathan .
ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER-INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 2016, 39 :32-42
[7]   Effect of wire and arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) process parameters on bead geometry and microstructure [J].
Dinovitzer, Malcolm ;
Chen, Xiaohu ;
Laliberte, Jeremy ;
Huang, Xiao ;
Frei, Hanspeter .
ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2019, 26 :138-146
[8]   A geometric approach to leveraging weak learners [J].
Duffy, N ;
Helmbold, D .
THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2002, 284 (01) :67-108
[9]   Comprehensive Review On Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms [J].
Gianey, Hemant Kumar ;
Choudhary, Rishabh .
2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND DATA SCIENCE (MLDS 2017), 2017, :37-43
[10]  
Goodfellow I, 2016, ADAPT COMPUT MACH LE, P1