An Active Learning Reliability Analysis Method Based on Evidence Theory

被引:0
作者
Zhang, Zhe [1 ]
Bao, Wenli [1 ]
Yao, Zhongyang [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha
来源
Hunan Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences | 2025年 / 52卷 / 06期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
active learning kriging model; black box problem; evidence theory; reliability analysis; structural reliability;
D O I
10.16339/j.cnki.hdxbzkb.2025182
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
For the reliability analysis problem characterized by a single failure mode,cognitive uncertainty,and“black-box”models,an active learning reliability analysis method based on evidence theory is proposed. This method efficiently and accurately determines the credibility and verisimilitude of structures. It handles cognitive uncertain variables using evidence theory,initiates initial training sample construction for a Kriging model,and combines optimization methods with active learning to search for optimal training samples across the entire input variable space. This approach refines the Kriging model chronically with optimal training samples,replacing the functional function with the Kriging model to predict unknown points for credibility and verisimilitude calculation of the structure. By integrating optimization methods with active learning,the method relaxes constraints on candidate sample locations during traditional training sample search,thereby identifying training samples that better enhance the Kriging model’s correction effects and improve the efficiency and success rate of Kriging model construction. Numerical examples demonstrate the method’s computational effectiveness and its application to the reliability analysis of vehicle frontal collisions. © 2025 Hunan University. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 133
页数:13
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
FERSON S, GINZBURG L R., Different methods are needed to propagate ignorance and variability[J], Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 54, 2, pp. 133-144, (1996)
[2]  
HELTON J C., Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in the presence of stochastic and subjective uncertainty[J], Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 57, 1/2/3/4, pp. 3-76, (1997)
[3]  
DEMPSTER A P, LAIRD N M, RUBIN D B., Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm[J], Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B:Statistical Methodology, 39, 1, pp. 1-22, (1977)
[4]  
JIANG C, HAN X, Structural reliability analysis based on random distributions with interval parameters[J], Computers & Structures, 89, 23, pp. 2292-2302, (2011)
[5]  
MOLLER B, GRAF W, BEER M., Fuzzy structural analysis using α-level optimization[J], Computational Mechanics, 26, 6, pp. 547-565, (2000)
[6]  
ZADEH L A., Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility[J], Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 100, pp. 9-34, (1999)
[7]  
DEMPSTER A P., Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 38, 2, pp. 325-339, (1967)
[8]  
ZHANG Z., Structural reliability analysis method based on evidence theory[D], (2016)
[9]  
YIN S W, YU D J,, YIN H, A new evidence-theory-based method for response analysis of acoustic system with epistemic uncertainty by using Jacobi expansion, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 322, pp. 419-440, (2017)
[10]  
LIU X, GONG M, ZHOU Z H, An efficient mechanical structure reliability analysis method based on evidence theory, China Mechanical Engineering, 31, 17, pp. 2031-2037, (2020)