Study of Direct Gas Injection into stagnation zone of Blunt Nose at Hypersonic Flow

被引:0
作者
Harmon, Peter [1 ]
Vashishthat, Ashish [1 ]
Callaghan, Dean [2 ]
Nolan, Cathal [3 ]
Deiterding, Ralf [4 ]
机构
[1] Inst Technol Carlow, Aerosp & Mech Engn, Carlow R93 V960, Ireland
[2] Inst Technol Carlow, Ctr Res & Enterprise Engn EngCORE, Carlow R93 V960, Ireland
[3] Inst Technol Carlow, Dept Aerosp Mech & Elect Engn, Carlow R93 V960, Ireland
[4] Univ Southampton, Aerodynam & Flight Mech Res Grp, Highfield Campus, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
来源
AIAA PROPULSION AND ENERGY 2021 FORUM | 2021年
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Direct gas injection in the shocked or compressed region has importance in many applications from drag control to ignition and pressure gain combustion. This numerical study is focused on direct light gas injection into the stagnation zone of a blunt nose at hypersonic speed, aiming to achieve efficient active drag control. The direct injection of a inert gas helium and a reactive gas hydrogen in the stagnation zone of bow-shock, are compared numerically with the air injection at hypersonic flow Mach 6 with freestream conditions according to the Earth's altitude of 10 km. The two-dimensional axisymmetric numerical simulations are performed by adaptive mesh refinement and solving compressible Euler equations for multiple thermally perfect species with a reactive source term using AMROC solver. The hydrogen combustion and ignition is modelled using one-step reaction mechanism. The pressure drag on the blunt nose has been compared for different injection pressure ratios for all three gas injections and it was concluded that the sonic injection (at Mach = 1) of light gases He and H-2 provides similar performance in the pressure drag reduction up to 77 %, as compared to air injection, with 62.5 % and 73.5 % lesser mass flow rate, respectively. In case of supersonic gas injection (at Mach = 2), the inert gas helium injection performs relatively better (up to 82% pressure drag reduction) or comparable to supersonic air injection for lesser mass flow rates. Various flow features in the short and long penetration modes of sonic and supersonic gas injections are also analyzed in the reactive and non-reactive flow-fields.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Forebody shock control devices for drag and aero-heating reduction: A comprehensive survey with a practical perspective [J].
Ahmed, Mahmoud Y. M. ;
Qin, Ning .
PROGRESS IN AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 2020, 112
[2]   An approach of drag force decrease for combined cylinder AD bodies under the action of microwave and laser energy deposition [J].
Azarova, O. A. ;
Knight, D. D. .
AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 64 :154-160
[3]  
Deiterding R, 2003, THESIS
[4]   High-Resolution Numerical Simulation and Analysis of Mach Reflection Structures in DetonationWaves in Low-Pressure H-2-O-2-Ar Mixtures: A Summary of Results Obtained with the AdaptiveMesh Refinement Framework AMROC [J].
Deiterding, Ralf .
JOURNAL OF COMBUSTION, 2011, 2011
[5]   A parallel adaptive method for simulating shock-induced combustion with detailed chemical kinetics in complex domains [J].
Deiterding, Ralf .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2009, 87 (11-12) :769-783
[6]   Universal scaling parameter for a counter jet drag reduction technique in supersonic flows [J].
Desai, Siddesh ;
Prakash, Vishnu K. ;
Kulkarni, Vinayak ;
Gadgil, Hrishikesh .
PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2020, 32 (03)
[7]  
Hayashi K., 2003, 36 AIAA THERM C, P4041
[9]  
Kee R.J., 1990, SAND878215B SAND NAT
[10]  
Kee RJ, 1989, Tech. Rept. SAND-89-8009, DOI DOI 10.2172/5681118