Machine Learning based Single Photon Avalanche Diode Device Modeling

被引:0
作者
Mamun, Kazi Mohammad [1 ]
Hasan, Sajid [1 ]
Pala, Nezih [1 ,2 ]
Shawkat, Mst Shamim Ara [1 ]
机构
[1] Florida Int Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Miami, FL 33174 USA
[2] Terabrum LLC, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33331 USA
来源
SOUTHEASTCON 2025 | 2025年
关键词
Single Photon Avalanche Diode (SPAD); Machine Learning (ML); Device Modeling; Technology Computer-Aided Design (TCAD); Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost); Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM); Feed Forward Neural Network (FFNN);
D O I
10.1109/SOUTHEASTCON56624.2025.10971454
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper presents machine learning (ML) based novel single photon avalanche diode (SPAD) device modeling. We investigate three popular ML models, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) and Feed Forward Neural Network (FFNN) for predicting the IV characteristics of SPAD devices. Due to the data-driven nature, all of these models are viable alternatives to Technology Computer-Aided Design (TCAD) and can significantly reduce the computational cost. We trained and evaluated each of the models using a large amount of real-world I-V data produced through TCAD simulations and compared their performances. The FFNN model demonstrated a smooth convergence through the learning period with a coefficient of determination (R-2) of 0.9779 which means that it can generalize the model well. In comparision, LSTM and XGBoost outperformed FFNN with a higher R-2 of 0.9835 and 0.9929 respectively. Therefore, XGBoost captures the overall trend of the data better among these three models. Based on these findings, the XGBoost model proves to be more efficient in predicting the I-V characteristics of SPADs.
引用
收藏
页码:1276 / 1281
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[11]   The vanishing gradient problem during learning recurrent neural nets and problem solutions [J].
Hochreiter, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNCERTAINTY FUZZINESS AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 1998, 6 (02) :107-116
[12]   Statistical Modelling of SPADs for Time-of-Flight LiDAR [J].
Incoronato, Alfonso ;
Locatelli, Mauro ;
Zappa, Franco .
SENSORS, 2021, 21 (13)
[13]   Modeling of Perimeter Gated SPAD-based Direct Time-of-Flight Sensor for Low Light LiDAR Applications [J].
Irfan, Nahin ;
Hasan, Sajid ;
Shawkat, Mst Shamim Ara .
SOUTHEASTCON 2023, 2023, :749-754
[14]  
Jacoboni C, 2012, The Monte Carlo method for semiconductor device simulation
[15]   A High-PDE, Backside-Illuminated SPAD in 65/40-nm 3D IC CMOS Pixel With Cascoded Passive Quenching and Active Recharge [J].
Lindner, Scott ;
Pellegrini, Sara ;
Henrion, Yann ;
Rae, Bruce ;
Wolf, Martin ;
Charbon, Edoardo .
IEEE ELECTRON DEVICE LETTERS, 2017, 38 (11) :1547-1550
[16]   MODELING OF CARRIER MOBILITY AGAINST CARRIER CONCENTRATION IN ARSENIC-DOPED, PHOSPHORUS-DOPED, AND BORON-DOPED SILICON [J].
MASETTI, G ;
SEVERI, M ;
SOLMI, S .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, 1983, 30 (07) :764-769
[17]   A 256x128 3D-Stacked (45nm) SPAD FLASH LiDAR with 7-Level Coincidence Detection and Progressive Gating for 100m Range and 10klux Background Light [J].
Padmanabhan, Preethi ;
Zhang, Chao ;
Cazzaniga, Marco ;
Efe, Baris ;
Ximenes, Augusto R. ;
Lee, Myung-Jae ;
Charbon, Edoardo .
2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SOLID-STATE CIRCUITS CONFERENCE (ISSCC), 2021, 64 :112-+
[18]   Recent achievements in single photon detectors and their applications [J].
Prochazka, I ;
Hamal, K ;
Sopko, B .
JOURNAL OF MODERN OPTICS, 2004, 51 (9-10) :1289-1313
[19]   Machine learning based prediction of I-V and transconductance curves for 3D multichannel junctionless FinFET [J].
Raj, A. ;
Kumar, S. ;
Sharma, S. K. .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2024, 98 (13) :4515-4523
[20]  
Selberherr S., 2012, Analysis and Simulation of Semiconductor Devices