Oral Vancomycin for Prevention of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection A Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:1
作者
Keating, Julie A. [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Tinghui [3 ]
Graham, Mary Beth [6 ]
Ramesh, Mayur [7 ]
Khanna, Sahil [8 ]
Dixon, Jonah [1 ]
Kates, Ashley [1 ]
Haight, Kendra [5 ]
Zhao, Jiwei [3 ,4 ]
Saddler, Christopher [1 ]
Safdar, Nasia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Dept Med, 1685 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[2] William S Middleton Mem Vet Adm Med Ctr, Madison, WI USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat & Med Informat, Madison, WI USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Stat, Madison, WI USA
[5] UW Hlth, Madison, WI USA
[6] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Med, Div Infect Dis, Milwaukee, WI USA
[7] Henry Ford Hosp, Div Infect Dis, Detroit, MI USA
[8] Mayo Clin, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Rochester, MN USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
HEALTH-CARE EPIDEMIOLOGY; MOLECULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY; RESISTANT ENTEROCOCCI; DISEASES SOCIETY; AMERICA IDSA; RISK-FACTORS; COLONIZATION; GUIDELINES; MICROBIOTA; PROPHYLAXIS;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.17834
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ImportanceSystemic antibiotic use for patients with a non-Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a major risk factor for recurrent CDI. Increasing use of oral vancomycin for secondary prophylaxis against recurrent CDI in this context has uncertain efficacy. ObjectiveTo evaluate whether oral vancomycin prophylaxis compared with placebo is effective against recurrent CDI during and 8 weeks after the end of study treatment. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis phase 2, placebo-controlled, double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted in 4 large health systems across the upper Midwest US. Adults who had completed treatment for CDI within the past 180 days and were taking a systemic antibiotic for a non-CDI indication were enrolled between May 21, 2018, and March 30, 2023, and followed up for 8 weeks after the end of study treatment. InterventionParticipants were randomized 1:1 to 125 mg of oral vancomycin or placebo once daily during antibiotic use for a non-CDI plus 5 days following cessation of those antibiotics. Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was recurrent CDI incidence during treatment and the 8-week follow-up period. The secondary outcome was vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus carriage in stool. ResultsAmong 81 randomized participants (median age, 59 years [IQR, 50-67 years]), all were included in the primary as-randomized analysis (39 in the vancomycin group; 42 in the placebo group). Sixty patients (74.1%) completed 8-week follow-up and were included in the secondary as-completed treatment analysis (31 in the vancomycin group; 29 in the placebo group). Recurrent CDI occurred in 17 of 39 participants in the oral vancomycin group (43.6%) and 24 of 42 in the placebo group (57.1%; absolute difference in percentage, -13.5% [95% CI, -35.1% to 8.0%]). Adverse events occurred in 27 of 39 participants in the oral vancomycin group (69.2%) and 27 of 42 in the placebo group (64.3%). Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus carriage was found in 15 of 30 patients in the oral vancomycin group (50.0%) and 6 of 25 in the placebo group (24.0%) (P = .048) 8 weeks after treatment. Conclusions and RelevanceIn this randomized clinical trial, the incidence of recurrent CDI was lower (though did not reach significance) in participants taking oral vancomycin compared with those taking placebo. Because the study was underpowered, it was unable to reveal firm conclusions about the efficacy (or lack thereof) of vancomycin prophylaxis with respect to recurrent CDI. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03462459
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 36 条
[31]   Efficacy of Oral Vancomycin in Preventing Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection in Patients Treated With Systemic Antimicrobial Agents [J].
Van Hise, Nicholas W. ;
Bryant, Alex M. ;
Hennessey, Erin K. ;
Crannage, Andrew J. ;
Khoury, Jad A. ;
Manian, Farrin A. .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2016, 63 (05) :651-653
[32]   European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: 2021 update on the treatment guidance document for Clostridioides difficile infection in adults [J].
van Prehn, Joffrey ;
Reigadas, Elena ;
Vogelzang, Erik H. ;
Bouza, Emilio ;
Hristea, Adriana ;
Guery, Benoit ;
Krutova, Marcela ;
Noren, Torbjorn ;
Allerberger, Franz ;
Coia, John E. ;
Goorhuis, Abraham ;
van Rossen, Tessel M. ;
Ooijevaar, Rogier E. ;
Burns, Karen ;
Olesen, Bente R. Scharvik ;
Tschudin-Sutter, Sarah ;
Wilcox, Mark H. ;
Vehreschild, Maria J. G. T. ;
Fitzpatrick, Fidelma ;
Kuijper, Ed J. .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2021, 27 :S1-S21
[33]   Impact of oral vancomycin on gut microbiota, bile acid metabolism, and insulin sensitivity [J].
Vrieze, Anne ;
Out, Carolien ;
Fuentes, Susana ;
Jonker, Lisanne ;
Reuling, Isaie ;
Kootte, Ruud S. ;
van Nood, Els ;
Holleman, Frits ;
Knaapen, Max ;
Romijn, Johannes A. ;
Soeters, Maarten R. ;
Blaak, Ellen E. ;
Dallinga-Thie, Geesje M. ;
Reijnders, Dorien ;
Ackermans, Mariette T. ;
Serlie, Mireille J. ;
Knop, Filip K. ;
Holst, Jenst J. ;
van der Ley, Claude ;
Kema, Ido P. ;
Zoetendal, Erwin G. ;
de Vos, Willem M. ;
Hoekstra, Joost B. L. ;
Stroes, Erik S. ;
Groen, Albert K. ;
Nieuwdorp, Max .
JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 60 (04) :824-831
[34]   Antibiotic Exposure and Risk for Hospital-Associated Clostridioides difficile Infection [J].
Webb, Brandon J. ;
Subramanian, Aruna ;
Lopansri, Bert ;
Goodman, Bruce ;
Jones, Peter Bjorn ;
Ferraro, Jeffrey ;
Stenehjem, Edward ;
Brown, Samuel M. .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2020, 64 (04)
[35]   Oral vancomycin prophylaxis against recurrentClostridioides difficileinfection: Efficacy and side effects in two hospitals [J].
Zacharioudakis, Ioannis M. ;
Zervou, Fainareti N. ;
Dubrovskaya, Yanina ;
Phillips, Michael S. .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 41 (08) :908-913
[36]   Patient Perspectives on Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Clostridium Difficile Infection [J].
Zellmer C. ;
De Wolfe T.J. ;
Van Hoof S. ;
Blakney R. ;
Safdar N. .
Infectious Diseases and Therapy, 2016, 5 (2) :155-164