An mHealth monitoring system for traditional birth attendant-led antenatal risk assessment in rural Guatemala

被引:26
作者
Stroux L. [1 ]
Martinez B. [2 ]
Coyote Ixen E. [2 ]
King N. [2 ]
Hall-Clifford R. [3 ]
Rohloff P. [2 ]
Clifford G.D. [4 ]
机构
[1] Centre for Doctoral Training in Healthcare Innovation, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford
[2] Wuqu’ Kawoq Maya Health Alliance, Santiago Sacatepéquez
[3] Departments of Anthropology and Public Health, Agnes Scott College, Atlanta, GA
[4] Departments of Biomedical Informatics and Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
关键词
Intrauterine growth restriction; mHealth; perinatal monitoring; resource constrained healthcare;
D O I
10.1080/03091902.2016.1223196
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Limited funding for medical technology, low levels of education and poor infrastructure for delivering and maintaining technology severely limit medical decision support in low- and middle-income countries. Perinatal and maternal mortality is of particular concern with millions dying every year from potentially treatable conditions. Guatemala has one of the worst maternal mortality ratios, the highest incidence of intra-uterine growth restriction (IUGR), and one of the lowest gross national incomes per capita within Latin America. To address the lack of decision support in rural Guatemala, a smartphone-based system is proposed including peripheral sensors, such as a handheld Doppler for the identification of foetal compromise. Designed for use by illiterate birth attendants, the system uses pictograms, audio guidance, local and cloud processing, SMS alerts and voice calling. The initial prototype was evaluated on 22 women in highland Guatemala. Results were fed back into the refinement of the system, currently undergoing RCT evaluation. © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
引用
收藏
页码:356 / 371
页数:15
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Lawn J.E., Blencowe H., Oza S., Et al., Every newborn: progress, priorities, and potential beyond survival, Lancet, 384, pp. 189-205, (2014)
[2]  
(2015)
[3]  
Woods R., Long-term trends in fetal mortality: implications for developing countries, Bull World Health Organ, 86, pp. 460-466, (2008)
[4]  
Goldenberg R.L., McClure E.M., Maternal, fetal and neonatal mortality: lessons learned from historical changes in high income countries and their potential application to low-income countries, Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol, 1, (2015)
[5]  
Black R.E., Allen L.H., Bhutta Z.A., Et al., Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences, Lancet, 371, pp. 243-260, (2008)
[6]  
de OnisBlssner M.M., Villar J., Levels and patterns of intrauterine growth retardation in developing countries, Eur J Clin Nutr, 52, pp. S5-S15, (1998)
[7]  
Peters M., Crowe J., Piri J.F., Et al., Monitoring the fetal heart non-invasively: a review of methods, J Perinat Med, 29, pp. 408-416, (2001)
[8]  
Ayres-de Campos D., Bernardes J., Twenty-five years after the FIGO guidelines for the use of foetal monitoring: Time for a simplified approach?, Int J Gynecol Obstet, 110, pp. 1-6, (2010)
[9]  
(2014)
[10]  
Tamrat T., Kachnowski S., Special delivery: an analysis of mhealth in maternal and newborn health programs and their outcomes around the world, Matern Child Health J, 16, pp. 1092-1101, (2012)