Fluorescence Spectral Characteristics of Dissolved Organic Matter in Typical Reservoirs in the Yellow River Basin

被引:0
作者
Wu, Li [1 ]
Chang, Miao [1 ]
Lai, Meng-Yuan [1 ]
Zhao, Tong-Qian [1 ]
Wang, Liang [2 ]
机构
[1] College of Resources and Environment, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo
[2] Henan Jiyuan Ecological Environment Testing Center, Jiyuan
来源
Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi/Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis | 2025年 / 45卷 / 07期
关键词
Dissolved organic matter; Reservoir; Three-dimensional fluorescence spectroscopy; Water-sediment regulation;
D O I
10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2025)07-2093-08
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Xiaolangdi Reservoir is the largest hydraulic engineering project in the Yellow River Basin, and the annual watersediment regulation can reduce siltation in the downstream river. However, reservoir storage will change the hydrodynamic conditions of the river. Exploring the differences in the spectral characteristics of dissolved organic matter (DOM) before and after reservoir storage is crucial to reveal the changes in the aquatic ecosystem of the Yellow River Basin. In 2021, water samples were collected before, during, and after the water-sediment regulation period. The characteristics of the change in DOM fluorescence spectral parameters in the reservoir were analyzed. The DOM components and their sources were resolved using three-dimensional fluorescence spectroscopy coupled with the parallel factor method. Combined with the water quality parameters of the water body, the key factors affecting the changes in DOM fluorescence characteristics in the reservoir were elucidated by correlation analysis and redundancy analysis (RDA). Results indicated that (1) the fluorescence index and humification index of DOM did not change remarkably in all periods. The DOM of the reservoir water body was characterized by strong authigenicity and weak humification. During the water-sediment regulation, the authigenic index and freshness index of DOM decreased remarkably, and the newly authigenic DOM produced by microbial activities and other activities decreased in the reservoir area. (2) Four fluorescent components were resolved in the DOM of the Xiaolangdi Reservoir. Differences in the composition of the components were observed in different periods. The Cl and C2 components were humus-like substances, and the C3 and C4 components were protein-like in the non-water-sediment regulation period. On the contrary, the Cl, C2, and C3 components were humus-like substances, and the C4 component was a protein-like substance in the water-sediment regulation period. Reservoir DOM before water-sediment regulation was dominated by protein-like substances (52.95%). The exogenous DOM entered the water body because of reservoir drainage and sediment discharge during the regulation period, which led to a remarkable increase in the proportion of humus-like substances (78.53%). The proportion of humus-like substances after watersediment regulation was 58.80%. (3) Correlation analysis showed that water temperature (WT), flow, and sand content were the main factors influencing the source of DOM in Xiaolangdi Reservoir. During the non-water-sediment regulation period, DOM concentration was mainly affected by the exogenous input of humus-like substances. The degradation of tyrosine components may be related to pH and electrical conductivity (EC). RDA found that pH, WT, and EC were the main environmental factors affecting the differences in DOM fractions in different periods. The results of this study can provide basic data for the study of the fluorescence characteristics of DOM in the Yellow River Basin reservoirs, as well as the scientific basis for further revealing the influence of water body disturbance on the carbon cycle in the Yellow River Basin. © 2025 Science Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2093 / 2100
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
JIANG Xin-tong, XIAO Qi-tao, LI Yi-min, Et al., Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分 析), 43, 5, (2023)
[2]  
Liu H N, Du Y, Shi Z Y, Et al., Chemosphere, 341, (2023)
[3]  
Rodriguez-Vidal F J, Garcia-Valverde M, Ortega-Azabache B, Et al., Journal of Environmental Management, 263, (2020)
[4]  
WANG Shi-huan, SHI Xiao-hong, ZHAO Sheng-nan, Et al., Environmental Science(环境科学), 45, 11, (2024)
[5]  
Bao Y, Huang T, Ning C W, Et al., Journal of Environmental Sciences, 124, (2023)
[6]  
LI Xiao-song, LI Wen-ying, WANG Yu, Et al., Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 44, 11, (2024)
[7]  
Chen J B, Liu M, Wang F Y, Et al., Science of the Total Environment, 912, (2024)
[8]  
He D, Wang K, Pang Y, Et al., Water Research, 187, (2020)
[9]  
ZHOU Shi-lei, SUN Yue, YUAN Shi-chao, Et al., Environmental Science, 41, 6, (2020)
[10]  
Liu S M, Li L W, Zhang G L, Et al., Journal of Hydrology, 430, (2012)