Industrial policy, congruence, and innovation: Evidence from "Chinese NASDAQ"

被引:0
作者
Hua, Xiuping [1 ]
Wang, Yong [2 ]
Xia, Junjie [3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Haochen [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham Ningbo, Business Sch, NFTZ Blockchain Lab, UNNC, Ningbo, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Inst New Struct Econ INSE, Room 503,5 Yiheyuan Rd, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[3] Cent Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Peking Univ, Inst New Struct Econ INSE, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Econ, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国国家社会科学基金;
关键词
Congruence; Industrial policy; Innovation; R&D intensity; Patents; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; DEVELOPMENT SUBSIDIES; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; GOVERNMENT; PERFORMANCE; TECHNOLOGY; PRIVATE; INCENTIVES; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2025.105298
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the association between firm innovation and endowment-based fundamental factors through the lens of congruence and then examines the impact of a national-level industrial policy on this newly established link. Based on a sample of small and innovative firms listed on the National Equities Exchange and Quotations, China's NASDAQ counterpart, we find that firms with greater congruence with local endowment structure tend to have more innovation inputs and outputs. Additionally, in a quasi-experimental setting, we further examine the effect of the "Made in China 2025" (MC2025) industrial policy. Our findings indicate that MC2025 increases bank loans for treated firms and weakens the positive association between congruence and firm innovation. This suggests that MC2025 has a dual impact: while it increases access to capital, it may also lead to capital misallocations and policy distortions, ultimately hindering long-term innovation capabilities.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Innovation, Reallocation, and Growth [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Akcigit, Ufuk ;
Alp, Harun ;
Bloom, Nicholas ;
Kerr, William .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2018, 108 (11) :3450-3491
[2]   Industrial Policy and Competition [J].
Aghion, Philippe ;
Cai, Jing ;
Dewatripont, Mathias ;
Du, Luosha ;
Harrison, Ann ;
Legros, Patrick .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-MACROECONOMICS, 2015, 7 (04) :1-32
[3]   Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation [J].
Andriopoulos, Constantine ;
Lewis, Marianne W. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (04) :696-717
[4]   State and Development: The Need for a Reappraisal of the Current Literature [J].
Bardhan, Pranab .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2016, 54 (03) :862-892
[5]   Appropriate technology and growth [J].
Basu, S ;
Weil, DN .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1998, 113 (04) :1025-1054
[6]   The allocation and effectiveness of China's R&D subsidies - Evidence from listed firms [J].
Boeing, Philipp .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (09) :1774-1789
[7]   The case against intellectual property [J].
Boldrin, M ;
Levine, D .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2002, 92 (02) :209-212
[8]   The world technology frontier [J].
Caselli, Francesco ;
Coleman, Wilbur John, II .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2006, 96 (03) :499-522
[9]  
Chandler G.N., 2000, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, V25, P59, DOI 10.1177/104225870002500106
[10]   The distinct signaling effects of R & D subsidy and non-R & D subsidy on IPO performance of IT entrepreneurial firms in China [J].
Chen, Jin ;
Heng, Cheng Suang ;
Tan, Bernard C. Y. ;
Lin, Zhijie .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2018, 47 (01) :108-120