Enacting Data Feminism in Advocacy Data Work

被引：4

作者：

Darian S. ^{[1
]}

Chauhan A. ^{[1
]}

Marton R. ^{[1
]}

Ruppert J. ^{[1
]}

Anderson K. ^{[1
]}

Clune R. ^{[1
]}

Cupchak M. ^{[1
]}

Gannett M. ^{[1
]}

Holton J. ^{[1
]}

Kamas E. ^{[1
]}

Kibozi-Yocka J. ^{[1
]}

Mauro-Gallegos D. ^{[1
]}

Naylor S. ^{[1
]}

O'malley M. ^{[1
]}

Patel M. ^{[1
]}

Sandberg J. ^{[1
]}

Siegler T. ^{[1
]}

Tate R. ^{[1
]}

Temtim A. ^{[1
]}

Whaley S. ^{[1
]}

Voida A. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] University of Colorado Boulder, UCB 315, 1045 18th Street, Boulder, 80309, CO

来源：

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction | 2023年 / 7卷 / CSCW1期

关键词：

advocacy; data economy; data feminism; data work; nonprofit; social sector; third sector;

D O I：

10.1145/3579480

中图分类号：

T [工业技术]; C [社会科学总论];

学科分类号：

03 ; 0303 ; 08 ;

摘要：

In this paper, we present the results of a study that examines the role of data in nonprofit advocacy work. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 25 individuals who play critical roles in the data work of 18 different advocacy organizations. Our analysis reveals five key stakeholders in advocacy data work-beneficiaries, policymakers, funding and partner organizations, gatekeepers, and local publics. It also contributes a framework of four functions of data work in nonprofit organizations-data as amplifier, activator, legitimizer, and incubator. We characterize the challenges in data work that exist, particularly in widespread attempts to reappropriate data work across functions. These challenges in reappropriation are often rooted in participants' effects to enact data feminist principles from the margins of the data economy. Finally, we discuss how nonprofit institutions operate outside of the dominant data work goals known as the three Ss (surveillance, selling, and science) and propose a fourth S, social good, that is working to challenge the norms of the data economy and should be considered in research regarding the data economy moving forward. © 2023 ACM.

引用

共 68 条

[1]

Health of the U. S. nonprofit sector, (2021)

[2]

Alvarado Garcia A., Young A.L., Dombrowski L., On making data actionable: How activists use imperfect data to foster social change for human rights violations in Mexico, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 1, CSCW, pp. 1-19, (2017)

[3]

Appadurai A., Fear of small numbers, (2006)

[4]

Aronson E., Patnoe S., Cooperation in the classroom: The jigsaw method, (2010)

[5]

Asad M., Dantec Le C.A., This Is Shared Work:" Negotiating Boundaries in a Social Service Intermediary Organization, Media and Communication, 7, 3, pp. 69-78, (2019)

[6]

Bates J., Lin Y., Goodale P., Data journeys: Capturing the socio-material constitution of data objects and flows, Big Data & Society, 3, 2, pp. 1-12, (2016)

[7]

Baum A., Expanding Audience and Impact: Nonprofits Communicating Data to External Audiences, (2015)

[8]

Lehn M.B., Account space: How accountability requirements shape nonprofit practice, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37, 2, pp. 201-223, (2008)

[9]

Lehn M.B., Bringing Beneficiaries More Centrally Into Nonprofit Management Education and Research, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 50, 1, pp. 5-26, (2021)

[10]

Benjamin L.M., Campbell D.C., Programs aren't everything, Stanford Social Innovation Review, 12, 2, pp. 42-47, (2014)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 →