Toward A Framework for Formative Assessment of Conceptual Learning in K-12 Computer Science Classrooms

被引:18
作者
Grover, Shuchi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Looking Glass Ventures, Palo Alto, CA 94306 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 52ND ACM TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, SIGCSE 2021 | 2021年
关键词
formative assessment; computer science education; K-12 computer science education; teacher preparation; introductory programming; COMPUTATIONAL THINKING;
D O I
10.1145/3408877.3432460
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Unlike summative assessment that is aimed at grading students at the end of a unit or academic term, formative assessment is assessment for learning, aimed at monitoring ongoing student learning to provide feedback to both student and teacher, so that learning gaps can be addressed during the learning process. Education research points to formative assessment as a crucial vehicle for improving student learning. Formative assessment in K-12 CS and programming classrooms remains a crucial unaddressed need. Given that assessment for learning is closely tied to teacher pedagogical content knowledge, formative assessment literacy needs to also be a topic of CS teacher PD. This position paper addresses the broad need to understand formative assessment and build a framework to understand the what, why, and how of formative assessment of introductory programming in K-12 CS. It shares specific programming examples to articulate the cycle of formative assessment, diagnostic evaluation, feedback, and action. The design of formative assessment items is informed by CS research on assessment design, albeit related largely to summative assessment and in CS1 contexts, and learning of programming, especially student misconceptions. It describes what teacher formative assessment literacy PD should entail and how to catalyze assessment-focused collaboration among K-12 CS teachers through assessment platforms and repositories.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 37
页数:7
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], Project quantum
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, P 4 INT WORKSH COMP, DOI DOI 10.1145/1404520.1404532
[3]  
Armoni Michal., 2014, ACM Inroads, V5, P31
[4]  
Barron B., 2008, POWERFUL LEARNING WH
[5]  
Basawapatna A R., 2015, Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, P12
[6]  
Biggs J., 1982, Evaluating the quality of learning-The SOLO taxonomy
[7]  
Black P., 1998, ASSESS EDUC, V5, P7, DOI [DOI 10.1080/0969595980050102, 10.1080/0969595980050102]
[8]   Developing the theory of formative assessment [J].
Black, Paul ;
Wiliam, Dylan .
EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT EVALUATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY, 2009, 21 (01) :5-31
[9]  
Bloom B.S., 1969, Educational evaluation: New rules, new mean, V68, P26
[10]  
Brookhart S., 2003, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, V22, P5, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1745-3992.2003.TB00139.X