Kinship and Belonging in "Open Adoption": How Do Children Make Sense of Their Family Connections Through Visual Representations?

被引:0
作者
Costa, Pedro Alexandre [1 ]
Gubello, Alessio [1 ]
Conceicao, Marta [2 ]
Tasker, Fiona [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Birkbeck, London, England
[2] Inst Univ Ispa, Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Open Adoption; LGBTI+ Parenthood; Family Relationships; Children's Drawings; Nontraditional Kinship; Genograms; Kinetic Famly Drawings; LONGITUDINAL FOLLOW-UP; SIBLING RELATIONSHIPS; BIRTH FAMILY; GAY; CONTACT; DRAWINGS; FOSTER; EXPERIENCES; ADJUSTMENT;
D O I
10.1080/10926755.2025.2527060
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
The study's objective was to examine how 25 children in "open adoption" placements: 12 children (5-11 years old) and 13 adolescents (12-18 years old) represented and discussed their family connections in different family types, including gay, lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual-parented families. Children were interviewed and completed two visual depictions of their family relationships: (1) the Kinetic Family Drawing [KFD], and (2) the Apple Tree Family [ATF]. Interview data were quantified to consider four axes of family depiction: (1) Number, (2) Inclusion, (3) Order, and (4) Closeness to family members. Children included significantly fewer family members on the KFD than on the ATF. All children included adoptive parents on both measures while 17% included birth parents on the KFD and 47% on the ATF. Children tended to first include adoptive family members on the KFD and the ATF and positioned themselves closer to their adoptive family than to their birth parents on both. No significant differences between family types (Lesbian/Gay/Bisexual vs. Heterosexual Parent/s) were found. The KFD captures the quality of family relationships whereas the ATF encourages depiction of a wide array of family connections. Our findings point to similar good parent-child relationships across lesbian, gay, and heterosexual parented adoptive families.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Ainsworth M. D. S., 1978, PATTERNS ATTACHMENT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Children looked after in England (including adoption) 2021 to 2022
[3]   Children's drawings: self-perception and family function in international adoption [J].
Bannon, Brittany L. ;
Tirella, Linda G. ;
Miller, Laurie C. .
EARLY CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND CARE, 2016, 186 (08) :1285-1301
[4]   Adolescent Sibling Narratives Regarding Contact in Adoption [J].
Berge, Jerica ;
Green, Kevin ;
Grotevant, Harold ;
Mcroy, Ruth .
ADOPTION QUARTERLY, 2005, 9 (2-3) :81-103
[5]   A Sense of Belonging: Meanings of Family and Home in Long-Term Foster Care [J].
Biehal, Nina .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2014, 44 (04) :955-971
[6]   Using drawing in research with children: lessons from practice [J].
Bland, Derek .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH & METHOD IN EDUCATION, 2018, 41 (03) :342-352
[7]  
Brodzinsky D.M., 2005, Psychological Issues in Adoption: Research and Practice
[8]   Contact with birth family in intercountry adoptions: Comparing families headed by sexual minority and heterosexual parents [J].
Brodzinsky, David ;
Goldberg, Abbie E. .
CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2017, 74 :117-124
[9]   Family Structural Openness and Communication Openness as Predictors in the Adjustment of Adopted Children [J].
Brodzinsky, David .
ADOPTION QUARTERLY, 2006, 9 (04) :1-18
[10]   Contact with birth family in adoptive families headed by lesbian, gay male, and heterosexual parents [J].
Brodzinsky, David M. ;
Goldberg, Abbie E. .
CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2016, 62 :9-17