System Architecture Optimization: An Open Source Multidisciplinary Aircraft Jet Engine Architecting Problem

被引:0
作者
Bussemaker, J. H. [1 ]
De Smedtt, T. [2 ]
La Rocca, G. [2 ]
Ciampa, P. D. [1 ]
Nagel, B. [1 ]
机构
[1] DLR German Aerosp Ctr, Inst Syst Architectures Aeronaut, MDO Grp, Aircraft Design & Syst Integrat, Hamburg, Germany
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Aerosp Engn, Flight Performance & Prop, Delft, Netherlands
来源
AIAA AVIATION 2021 FORUM | 2021年
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Decisions regarding the system architecture are important and taken early in the design process, however suffer from large design spaces and expert bias. Systematic design space exploration techniques, like optimization, can be applied to system architecting. Realistic engineering benchmark problems are needed to enable development of optimization algorithms that can successfully solve these black-box, hierarchical, mixed-discrete, multi-objective architecture optimization problems. Such benchmark problems support the development of more capable optimization algorithms, more suitable methods for modeling system architecture design space, and educating engineers and other stakeholders on system architecture optimization in general. In this paper, an engine architecting benchmark problem is presented that exhibits all this behavior and is based on the open-source simulation tools pyCycle and OpenMDAO. Next to thermodynamic cycle analysis, the proposed benchmark problem includes modules for the estimation of engine weight, length, diameter, noise and NOx emissions. The problem is defined using modular interfaces, allowing to tune the complexity of the problem, by varying the number of design variables, objectives and constraints. The benchmark problem is validated by comparing to pyCycle example cases and existing engine performance data, and demonstrated using both a simple and a realistic problem formulation, solved using the multiobjective NSGA-II algorithm. It is shown that realistic results can be obtained, even though the design space is subject to hidden constraints due to the engine evaluation not converging for all design points.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Systems Architecting Methodology for Space Transportation Infrastructure [J].
Aliakbargolkar, Alessandro ;
Crawley, Edward F. ;
Wicht, Anthony C. ;
Battat, Jonathan A. ;
Calandrelli, Emily D. .
JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 2013, 50 (03) :579-590
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1986, THE JET ENGINE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Aeronautical Technologies for the Twenty-First Century
[4]   Pymoo: Multi-Objective Optimization in Python']Python [J].
Blank, Julian ;
Deb, Kalyanmoy .
IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 :89497-89509
[5]  
Bussemaker J., 2021, jbussemaker/OpenTurbofanArchitecting: Aircraft Jet Engine Architecting Benchmark Problem, DOI [10.5281/ZENODO5011359, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO5011359]
[6]  
Bussemaker JH, 2020, AIAA AVIATION 2020 FORUM
[7]  
Ciampa Pier Davide, 2020, AIAA AVIATION 2020 F
[8]  
COBRA Project Consortium, 2018, Final Report Summary-COBRA (Innovative counter rotating fan system for high bypass ratio aircraft engine)
[9]  
Crawley E., 2015, System architecture: strategy and product development for complex systems, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-4399-4
[10]  
Dallara E. S., 2011, "Aircraft Design for Reduced Climate Impact