Seismic Testing and Performance Evaluation of Unitized Curtain Walls

被引:0
作者
Bianchi, Simona [1 ]
Lori, Guido [2 ]
Hayez, Valerie [3 ]
Manara, Giampiero [2 ]
Schipper, Roel [1 ]
Pampanin, Stefano [4 ,5 ]
Overend, Mauro [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Delft, Netherlands
[2] Permasteelisa SpA, Vittorio Veneto, Italy
[3] Dow Silicones, Seneffe, Belgium
[4] Sapienza Univ, Rome, Italy
[5] Univ Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
experimental testing; fragility curves; glazed facades; seismic performance; structural silicone glazing; FRAGILITY; GLASS;
D O I
10.1002/eqe.70017
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Unitized curtain walls are widely adopted in contemporary architecture for their lightweight construction, aesthetic qualities, ease of installation and high operational performance. They are particularly used in high-rise buildings, where glazed facades are designed to meet a broad range of performance criteria. Well-designed systems tend to perform satisfactorily in normal service conditions, but are more problematic in extreme events. In fact, post-earthquake surveys in seismic-prone regions reveal functionality losses and moderate-to-severe damage to glazed facades, with significant financial, social and environmental consequences. Despite studies on the seismic behaviour of unitized curtain walls, research in this field remains limited. In particular, experimental studies to date rarely assess both serviceability and ultimate limit states, fail to fully characterize the sequence of damage states until collapse and overlook the influence of design choices on the fa & ccedil;ade performance. To address these gaps, an extensive experimental campaign on full-scale unitized curtain walls was conducted to investigate the seismic behaviour of fa & ccedil;ade units, including variations in geometry, joint aspect ratios and type (dry-glazed or wet-glazed), frame detailing. The experiments involved quasi-static and dynamic loading, considering in-plane, out-of-plane and vertical movements. Air infiltration, water leakage and wind resistance tests were conducted before and after low-intensity shaking to assess the post-earthquake fa & ccedil;ade serviceability. Analysis of experimental data highlighted the significant influence of silicone joints on glass rotations and the structural strength hierarchy. Fragility curves were derived from damage observations, which revealed weather-tightness loss at a 0.71% drift ratio and silicone failure in specimens with low-displacement capacity frames.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 42 条
[21]  
Galli U., 2011, Seismic Behaviour of Curtain Wall Facades-a Comparison Between Experimental Mock-Up Test and Finite Element Method Analysis
[22]   Reclamation potential in the built environment: A method and metric for assessing environmental benefits beyond first use [J].
Hartwell, Rebecca ;
Overend, Mauro .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 263
[23]   Circular economy of facades: Real-world challenges and opportunities [J].
Hartwell, Rebecca ;
Macmillan, Sebastian ;
Overend, Mauro .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2021, 175
[24]  
Hayez V., 2023, Glass Performance Days
[25]   Seismic demand and experimental evaluation of the nonstructural building curtain wall: A review [J].
Huang, Baofeng ;
Chen, Shiming ;
Lu, Wensheng ;
Mosalam, Khalid M. .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2017, 100 :16-33
[26]  
JASS14, 1996, Japanese Architectural Standard Specification Curtain Wall
[27]   Seismic behavior of a fully tempered insulating glass curtain wall system under various loading protocols [J].
Ji, Xiaodong ;
Zhuang, Yuncheng ;
Lim, Wanhui ;
Qu, Zhe .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2024, 53 (01) :68-88
[28]  
Kimberlain J., 2022, Facade Tectonics 2022 World Congress
[29]  
Klein Tillmann., 2013, Integral Facade Construction - towards a New Product Architecture for Curtain Walls, Architecture and the Built environment
[30]   Experimental evaluation of a glass curtain wall of a tall building [J].
Lu, Wensheng ;
Huang, Baofeng ;
Mosalam, Khalid M. ;
Chen, Shiming .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2016, 45 (07) :1185-1205