The Facilitating Act Framework: A new insight into cultural ecosystem services through investigating women, wild swimming and community

被引:0
作者
Barnard, Lucy [1 ,2 ]
O'Connor, Seb [3 ]
Glenk, Klaus [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Geosci, Edinburgh, Scotland
[2] Univ Sheffield, Sch Biosci, Sheffield, England
[3] SRUC, Dept Rural Econ Environm & Soc, Edinburgh, Scotland
关键词
cultural ecosystem services; facilitating act framework; Q methodology; recreation; relational thinking; values; wild swimming; SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE; RELATIONAL THINKING; VALUES; WORK;
D O I
10.1002/pan3.70077
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
We present the Facilitating Act Framework (FAF) as a way to challenge more linear ways of thinking about cultural ecosystem services. The framework moves towards more relational and participant-led processes to provide insights on how values emerge through engaging with nature. The FAF has three pillars: (i) participant autonomy, (ii) open-ended parameters, and (iii) focusing on processes over outcomes. We the FAF to a case study of women and wild swimming in Scotland, illustrating how each of the pillars can be applied in practice using a mixed methods approach with a Q methodology element at its core. We identify four factors, the 'competitive edge', 'connection-to-nature seekers', 'sharers and carers' and 'enablers' that variously characterised what was important to women when they participated in the 'act' of wild swimming. This case study revealed the importance of community and the key social dynamics through which values emerged and connected people to nature, pointing to a range of better targeted possible policy interventions. The FAF offers an avenue to deepen our understanding of how values emerge through interactions with nature as a way to better embed relational thinking in the context of cultural ecosystem services.Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   Being, having and belonging: values and ways of engaging in sport [J].
Aggerholm, Kenneth ;
Breivik, Gunnar .
SPORT IN SOCIETY, 2021, 24 (07) :1142-1156
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Alpkit
[3]   Widening the Evaluative Space for Ecosystem Services: A Taxonomy of Plural Values and Valuation Methods [J].
Arias-Arevalo, Paola ;
Gomez-Baggethun, Erik ;
Martin-Lopez, Berta ;
Perez-Rincon, Mario .
ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES, 2018, 27 (01) :29-53
[4]   Seeking sustainability discourses with Q methodology [J].
Barry, J ;
Proops, J .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 28 (03) :337-345
[5]   Bringing Ecosystem Services into Economic Decision-Making: Land Use in the United Kingdom [J].
Bateman, Ian J. ;
Harwood, Amii R. ;
Mace, Georgina M. ;
Watson, Robert T. ;
Abson, David J. ;
Andrews, Barnaby ;
Binner, Amy ;
Crowe, Andrew ;
Day, Brett H. ;
Dugdale, Steve ;
Fezzi, Carlo ;
Foden, Jo ;
Hadley, David ;
Haines-Young, Roy ;
Hulme, Mark ;
Kontoleon, Andreas ;
Lovett, Andrew A. ;
Munday, Paul ;
Pascual, Unai ;
Paterson, James ;
Perino, Grischa ;
Sen, Antara ;
Siriwardena, Gavin ;
van Soest, Daan ;
Termansen, Mette .
SCIENCE, 2013, 341 (6141) :45-50
[6]   Bobbing in the park: wild swimming, conviviality and belonging [J].
Bates, Charlotte ;
Moles, Kate .
LEISURE STUDIES, 2022, :887-899
[7]   Immersive encounters: video, swimming and wellbeing [J].
Bates, Charlotte ;
Moles, Kate .
VISUAL STUDIES, 2023, 38 (01) :69-80
[8]  
Baulcomb C., 2022, factorHunt() R function
[9]  
Brereton F., 2008, Sport in Society, V24, P1141
[10]  
Brown S.R., 1993, Operant subjectivity, V16, P91, DOI [DOI 10.15133/J.OS.1993.002, 10.22488/okstate.93.100504, DOI 10.22488/OKSTATE.93.100504]