Probabilistic Seismic Risk Assessment of School Buildings

被引:1
作者
Monteiro, Ricardo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sch Adv Studies IUSS, Pavia, Italy
来源
18TH INTERNATIONAL PROBABILISTIC WORKSHOP, IPW 2020 | 2021年 / 153卷
关键词
Risk assessment; Seismic retrofit; Cost-benefit analysis; Loss estimation; Modelling uncertainty; FRAGILITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-73616-3_2
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The inadequate behavior of existing school buildings observed during past earthquakes in Italy have underlined the need to accurately understand their seismic performance. In order to do so, different metrics can be adopted to characterize their seismic response, either more focused on structural aspects or economic variables. This paper assesses the seismic risk level for three case study school buildings, representing the main typologies found within the Italian school building stock, and comments on the eventual need for retrofitting. A probabilistic-based earthquake engineering (PBEE) performance assessment is carried out using detailed numerical models, analyzed under ground motion records of increasing intensity, to quantify risk-based decision variables, such as expected annual loss and mean annual frequency of collapse. As an alternative to the detailed PBEE framework, a simplified seismic risk classification framework, recently applied in Italy, was also implemented. Different uncertainty parameters are included in the risk estimation frameworks, with a view also to future large-scale implementation of cost-benefit analyses. Lastly, one of the school buildings is further analyzed to understand the impact of the structural modelling uncertainty in the risk estimates and the consequent need for its proper consideration. The results show how the simplified risk classification framework is, as expected, conservative with respect to the detailed component-based approach, as well as the need for retrofitting of some of the building structural systems.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 38
页数:24
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Ancheta T., 2013, PEER report no. 2013/03
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, PEER repost 2007/03
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Norme tecniche delle costruzioni - D.M. 17/01/2018
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, 1998 3
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, FEMA P-58-3, V3
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2012, METHODOLOGY-EUR, V1 -
[7]   Efficient Analytical Fragility Function Fitting Using Dynamic Structural Analysis [J].
Baker, Jack W. .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2015, 31 (01) :579-599
[8]   Horizontal cladding panels: in-plane seismic performance in precast concrete buildings [J].
Belleri, Andrea ;
Torquati, Mauro ;
Marini, Alessandra ;
Riva, Paolo .
BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2016, 14 (04) :1103-1129
[9]  
Borzi B., 2011, COMPDYN 2011 3 ECOMA
[10]  
Borzi B., 2013, COMPUTATIONAL METHOD, P317, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-6573-3_16