DIGITAL TEACHING COMPETENCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION FRAMEWORKS: SCOPING REVIEW

被引:0
作者
Bressan, Douglas [1 ]
Santos, Cassio [2 ]
Da Silva, Samira Fayez Kfouri [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pitagoras Unopar Anhanguera, Metodol Ensino Linguagens & Tecnol, Londrina, Brazil
[2] Univ Lisbon, UIDEF, Inst Educ, Lisbon, Portugal
来源
SISYPHUSJOURNAL OF EDUCATION | 2025年 / 13卷 / 02期
关键词
digital teaching competencies; assessment frameworks; higher education; scoping review; UNIVERSITY TEACHERS; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.25749/sis.41209
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Digital teaching competence (DTC) has become a central element in higher education, driven by digital transformation in education and the need for innovative pedagogical practices. This study conducts a Scoping Review, based on 23 scientific articles (2019-2024), following the PRISMA protocol to map and analyze the main frameworks used to assess DTC in higher education. The results indicate that DigCompEdu is the most predominant model (16 studies), followed by MCCDD (INTEF) (3 studies) and TPACK (2 studies), highlighting the influence of European frameworks as well as adaptations to regional contexts, such as China's TDL. The analysis reveals that Spain has the highest number of publications (11 studies), reflecting its alignment with the European Union's digital education policies. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic significantly increased the relevance of these frameworks, particularly in digital assessment and hybrid teaching. Among the identified challenges are cultural adaptation, practical implementation, and teacher engagement in training programs. The study concludes that frameworks are essential for guiding DTC development but require institutional support and customization to meet local demands.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 138
页数:28
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[2]   Digital competence among university professors: analysis of the impact of the COVID crisis [J].
Alberto Perez-Rivero, Carlos ;
de la Mercedes de Obesso, Maria ;
Nunez-Canal, Margarita .
ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2022,
[3]  
Alonso-Garcia S., 2024, Educational Technology Review, V42, P101, DOI [10.3926/jotse.2521, DOI 10.3926/JOTSE.2521]
[4]  
Alvarez Ramos E. A., 2024, Lenguaje Y Textos, V58, P33, DOI [10.4995/lyt.2024.20819, DOI 10.4995/LYT.2024.20819]
[5]  
Alvarez-Flores Erika P., 2021, Form. Univ., V14, P33
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Recomendacao do Conselho de 22 de maio de 2018, sobre as Competencias Essenciais para a Aprendizagem ao Longo da Vida, V189, P1
[7]  
Barroso-Osuna J. M., 2016, Innoeduca. International Journal of Technology and Educational Innovation, V2, P77, DOI [10.20548/innoeduca.2016.v2i2.2028, DOI 10.20548/INNOEDUCA.2016.V2I2.2028]
[8]   NANO-MOOCs to train university professors in digital competences [J].
Basantes-Andrade, Andrea ;
Cabezas-Gonzalez, Marcos ;
Casillas-Martin, Sonia ;
Naranjo-Toro, Miguel ;
Benavides-Piedra, Andres .
HELIYON, 2022, 8 (06)
[9]   Definition of a self-reflection tool named Aurora for the assessment of university professors 'digital competence [J].
Bilbao-Aiastui, Eider ;
Gomez, Arantza Arruti ;
Morillo, Roberto Carballedo .
DIGITAL EDUCATION REVIEW, 2023, (44) :29-32
[10]   Digital competence of higher education professor according to DigCompEdu. Statistical research methods with ANOVA between fields of knowledge in different age ranges [J].
Cabero-Almenara, Julio ;
Guillen-Gamez, Francisco D. ;
Ruiz-Palmero, Julio ;
Palacios-Rodriguez, Antonio .
EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2021, 26 (04) :4691-4708