Social network effects on educational inequality: The role of similarity bias in social influence

被引:0
作者
Hovestadt, Till [1 ]
Lorenz, Georg [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Coll, Dept Sociol, New Rd, Oxford OX1 1NF, England
[2] Univ Utrecht, Dept Sociol, Padualaan 14, NL-3584 CH Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Socioeconomic status; Social origin; Peer effects; Aspirations; Multilevel SAOM; SECONDARY-SCHOOLS; PEER; SEGREGATION; IDENTIFICATION; ATTAINMENT; RESOURCES; HOUSEHOLD; SELECTION; FRIENDS; GERMANY;
D O I
10.1016/j.rssm.2025.101071
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
How do social networks affect educational inequality? Previous theory suggests that inequality is reinforced by a lack of social influence between social groups, while intergroup social influence could diminish inequality. According to this view, friendships between students with different socioeconomic status (SES) might decrease educational inequality due to cross-SES social influence. An underlying assumption is that social influence occurs ubiquitously across all friendships. We challenge this assumption and suggest that friends with the same SES exert stronger influence on each other than friends with a dissimilar SES-a phenomenon known as similarity bias. We test whether similarity bias based on SES is relevant for social influence on educational aspirations using multilevel Stochastic Actor-Oriented Models on longitudinal data of 236 friendship networks in Germany and Sweden. Pointing towards similarity bias, our results show that social influence on educational aspirations is significantly stronger among same-SES friends than among cross-SES friends. Counterfactual simulations based on the SAOMs suggest that the absence of similarity bias would lead to decreases in the socioeconomic aspiration gap by up to 9 percent. We conclude that similarity bias can stabilize educational inequality even in socioeconomically mixed social settings.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]  
Bandura A., 1977, SOCIAL LEARNING THEO
[2]   Navigating the school system in Sweden, Belgium, Austria and Germany: School segregation and second generation school trajectories [J].
Baysu, Gulseli ;
de Valk, Helga .
ETHNICITIES, 2012, 12 (06) :776-799
[3]   Homophily in Adolescence: Is Similarity in Status Characteristics Associated with Similarity in Anti-school Behaviour? [J].
Berten, Hans ;
Van Rossem, Ronan .
YOUNG, 2015, 23 (01) :76-96
[4]   Developmental intergroup theory: Explaining and reducing children's social stereotyping and prejudice [J].
Bigler, Rebecca S. ;
Liben, Lynn S. .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 16 (03) :162-166
[5]   Reciprocity, transitivity, and the mysterious three-cycle [J].
Block, Per .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2015, 40 :163-173
[6]  
Bourdieu P., 1986, HDB THEORY RES SOCIO, P241, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470755679.CH15
[7]   Explaining educational differentials - Towards a formal rational action theory [J].
Breen, R ;
Goldthorpe, JH .
RATIONALITY AND SOCIETY, 1997, 9 (03) :275-305
[8]   Interpersonal influences and educational aspirations in 12 countries: The importance of institutional context [J].
Buchmann, C ;
Dalton, B .
SOCIOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2002, 75 (02) :99-122
[9]  
Burgess S., 2011, Working Paper 11/267
[10]  
Working Paper