Revisiting the carbon footprint of cryptocurrency trading: A granger causality approach

被引:0
作者
Alabi, Abdulkadri Toyin [1 ]
Ishola, Abdullahi Omogbolahan [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Kwara State Univ, Sch Business & Governance, Malete, Nigeria
[2] Univ Essex, Essex Business Sch, Colchester, England
[3] Anglia Ruskin Univ London, Postgrad Sch, Import Bldg,2 Clove Cresent, London, England
关键词
Cryptocurrency; Carbon emissions; Bitcoin; Ethereum; BNB; Environmental sustainability; COINTEGRATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100995
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The environmental impact of cryptocurrencies has attracted increasing scrutiny, largely due to the high energy consumption of blockchain networks. However, empirical research on the causal relationship between cryptocurrency trading activity and carbon emissions remains scarce. This study addresses this gap by analysing the dynamic interplay between cryptocurrency trading and COQ emissions for Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Binance Coin, using monthly data from January 2015 to September 2024. Employing the Toda-Yamamoto augmented Granger causality approach, we apply logarithmic transformations to ensure data stationarity and address integration and endogeneity concerns. Our results reveal a bidirectional Granger causality between Bitcoin trading and COQ emissions, suggesting a feedback loop between market activity and environmental impact. For Ethereum, we find a similar albeit weaker bidirectional causality from trading to emissions, while no significant causal link is detected for Binance Coin, likely reflecting its more energy-efficient consensus mechanism. These findings highlight the disproportionate environmental burden of proof-of-work cryptocurrencies and underscore the need for targeted regulatory responses. We recommend the adoption of carbon-sensitive crypto policies, such as mandatory energy usage disclosures and incentives for transitioning to sustainable consensus mechanisms. This study advances the environmental finance literature by providing robust empirical evidence on the links between digital asset markets and carbon emissions.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Do bitcoin electricity consumption and carbon footprint exhibit random walk and bubbles? Analysis with policy implications [J].
Adewuyi, Adeolu O. ;
Wahab, Bashir A. ;
Tiwari, Aviral Kumar ;
Do, Hung Xuan .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 367
[2]   Multivariate Granger causality between macro variables and KSE 100 index: evidence from Johansen cointegration and Toda & Yamamoto causality [J].
Ahmed, Rizwan Raheem ;
Vveinhardt, Jolita ;
Streimikiene, Dalia ;
Fayyaz, Majid .
ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2017, 30 (01) :1497-1521
[3]   The Economic and Environmental Impact of Bitcoin [J].
Badea, Liana ;
Mungiu-Pupazan, Mariana Claudia .
IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 :48091-48104
[4]   Cryptocurrency blockchain and its carbon footprint: Anticipating future challenges [J].
Bajra, Ujkan Q. ;
Rogova, Ermir ;
Avdiaj, Sefer .
TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2024, 77
[5]   Climate policy uncertainty and the price dynamics of green and brown energy stocks [J].
Bouri, Elie ;
Iqbal, Najaf ;
Klein, Tony .
FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 47
[6]  
Campbell JohnY., 1991, NBER MACROECON ANNU, P141, DOI DOI 10.1086/654163
[7]  
Chamanara S., 2022, PREPRINT, DOI [10.1002/essoar.10507153.3, DOI 10.1002/ESSOAR.10507153.3]
[8]   Cryptocurrency return predictability: What is the role of the environment? [J].
Clark, Ephraim ;
Lahiani, Amine ;
Mefteh-Wali, Salma .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2023, 189
[9]  
Corbet S., 2020, Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Technology, P149, DOI DOI 10.1515/9783110660807-009
[10]   Revisiting Bitcoin's carbon footprint Comment [J].
de Vries, Alex ;
Gallersdoerfer, Ulrich ;
Klaassen, Lena ;
Stoll, Christian .
JOULE, 2022, 6 (03) :498-502