Adaptive graph spatio-temporal synchronization for traffic flow prediction based on NODEs

被引:0
作者
Shi, Xin [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Xin-Qian [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Xiang-Mo [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Jun-Yan [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Jian [3 ]
机构
[1] School of Information Engineering, Chang'an University, Shaanxi, Xi'an
[2] International Science and Technology Cooperation Base for Connected Vehicles and Intelligent Transportation Systems in Shaanxi Province, Chang'an University, Shaanxi, Xi'an
[3] School of Transportation, Southeast University, Jiangsu, Nanjing
来源
Jiaotong Yunshu Gongcheng Xuebao/Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering | 2025年 / 25卷 / 02期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
graph convolution network; intelligent transportation; joint spatio-temporal domain; neural ordinary differential equation; traffic flow prediction;
D O I
10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2025.02.011
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To tackle the continuity and synchronization in the acquisition of spatio-temporal features for traffic flow prediction, an adaptive graph based on neural ordinary differential equation (AGNODE) model for spatio-temporal synchronized traffic flow prediction was proposed. According to the correlations of semantic and distance in historical traffic flow data, a two-way prior adjacency matrix was defined. An adaptive adjacency matrix with automatically adjustable weights was designed by using dynamic filtering and node embedding. With the prior adjacency matrix and the adaptive adjacency matrix, a fusion layer of the static-dynamic map was established based on the linear weighted fusion, and an adaptive spatio-temporal synchronized graph containing both temporal and spatial dimensions was constructed via the vertex features in the virtual connection layer. The neural ordinary differential equations (NODE) were employed to solve the graph convolutional network (GCN) and then form the graph convolutional NODE (GCNODE). The AGNODE model was constructed by utilizing the time-aligned solution step and double-stacked GCNODE. Using the California freeway public traffic datasets (PeMS04 and PeMS08), combined with indicators such as the mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and training and inference time, the AGNODE model was tested and verified. Analysis results show that compared with those of the optimal baseline model of the spatio-temporal graph ordinary differential equation (STGODE), the MAE and RMSE of the AGNODE model in the single-step prediction (5 min) decrease by 3.6% and 2.8% on PeMS04, and by 2.2% and 1.7% on PeMS08, respectively. In the multistep predictions (15, 30, and 60 min), the MAE and RMSE of the AGNODE model decrease by an average of 3.0% and 2.4% on PeMS04, and by an average of 3.6% and 1.2% on PeMS08, respectively. As the network layer increases, the MAE and RMSE of the AGNODE model decrease by 5.3% and 2.6%, while those of the STGODE model decrease by 0.7% and 0.6%, respectively. The training and inference time of the AGNODE model on PeMS04 and PeMS08 decrease by 11.4% and 7.5%, respectively, compared with those of the attention-based spatial-temporal graph convolutional network (ASTGCN). Moreover, the AGNODE model can achieve better prediction accuracy with an additional time of no more than 7.7% compared to STGODE. Therefore, the AGNODE model can exhibit strong capabilities in spatio-temporal modelling and parameter adaptation, accurately predict the short-term traffic flow, and provide reliable flow information and decision basis for traffic participants. © 2025 Chang'an University. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 188
页数:18
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
TEDJOPURNOMO D A, BAO Z F, ZHENG B H, Et al., A survey on modern deep neural network for traffic prediction: trends, methods and challenges, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 34, 4, pp. 1544-1561, (2020)
[2]  
YAO Jun-feng, HE Rui, SHI Tong-tong, Et al., Review on machine learning-based traffic flow prediction methods, Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 23, 3, pp. 44-67, (2023)
[3]  
SHI X M, QI H, SHEN Y M, Et al., A spatial-temporal attention approach for traffic prediction, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 22, 8, pp. 4909-4918, (2020)
[4]  
GUO K, HU Y L, QIAN Z, Et al., Optimized graph convolution recurrent neural network for traffic prediction, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 22, 2, pp. 1138-1149, (2020)
[5]  
KUMAR S V, VANAJAKSHI L., Short-term traffic flow prediction using seasonal ARIMA model with limited input data, European Transport Research Review, 7, 3, pp. 1-9, (2015)
[6]  
CHEN C Y, HU J M, MENG Q, Et al., Short-time traffic flow prediction with ARIMA-GARCH model, 2011 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, pp. 607-612, (2011)
[7]  
ZIVOT E, WANG J H., Modeling Financial Time Series with S-PLUS, (2006)
[8]  
ZHANG L, LIU Q C, YANG W C, Et al., An improved K-nearest neighbor model for short-term traffic flow prediction, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 96, pp. 653-662, (2013)
[9]  
FENG X X, LING X Y, ZHENG H F, Et al., Adaptive multi-kernel SVM with spatial-temporal correlation for short-term traffic flow prediction, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 20, 6, pp. 2001-2013, (2018)
[10]  
BOUKERCHE A, WANG J H., Machine learning-based traffic prediction models for intelligent transportation systems, Computer Networks, 181, pp. 1389-1286, (2020)