Methods and Applications of Causal Reasoning in Medical Field

被引:0
作者
Wu, Xing [1 ]
Li, Jingwen [1 ]
Qian, Quan [1 ]
Liu, Yue [1 ]
Guo, Yike
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ, Sch Comp Engn & Sci, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
2021 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA AND INFORMATION ANALYTICS, BIGDIA | 2021年
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 上海市自然科学基金;
关键词
Causality; Explainable AI; Causal Reasoning; Treatment Effect Estimation; ADVERSE DRUG-REACTIONS; INFERENCE; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1109/BIGDIA53151.2021.9619639
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Causal reasoning is an important component of explainable AI and has been a key research topic across domains, especially in the medical field. O ne o f t he c ore p roblems is to infer the causal effect of treatment from medical data. However, when the traditional methods of dealing with effect estimations are applied to medical cases, there are obstacles such as instability, incomprehensibility, and unexplainability, which may not be able to deal with special medical data. Furthermore, there is no thorough survey of causal reasoning methods for specific medical problems. Therefore, we present a comprehensive survey of causal reasoning methods in the context of medicine, combining the advantages of both the medical field a nd causal reasoning. And take specific e xamples t o s how t he contribution of causal reasoning methods in disease prediction, diagnosis decision-making, treatment effect estimation, causal relationship mining, medical image analysis, and so on. This shows that causal reasoning methods have theoretical and practical significance in the medical field.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 86
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Acharya T. A., 2020, BIOMED PHARMACOL J, V13, P79, DOI DOI 10.13005/bpj/1863
[2]  
Aliprantis D., 2015, A distinction between causal effects in structural and rubin causal models
[3]   Approximate residual balancing: debiased inference of average treatment effects in high dimensions [J].
Athey, Susan ;
Imbens, Guido W. ;
Wager, Stefan .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2018, 80 (04) :597-623
[4]   SemCaDo: A serendipitous strategy for causal discovery and ontology evolution [J].
Ben Messaoud, Montassar ;
Leray, Philippe ;
Ben Amor, Nahla .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2015, 76 :79-95
[5]   Causal Inference Meets Machine Learning [J].
Cui, Peng ;
Shen, Zheyan ;
Li, Sheng ;
Yao, Liuyi ;
Li, Yaliang ;
Chu, Zhixuan ;
Gao, Jing .
KDD '20: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 26TH ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY & DATA MINING, 2020, :3527-3528
[6]   Learning causal Bayesian network structures from experimental data [J].
Ellis, Byron ;
Wong, Wing Hung .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 103 (482) :778-789
[7]  
Ellison G. T., 2020, medRxiv
[8]  
Genewein T, 2020, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2010.12237
[9]   Computational rationality: A converging paradigm for intelligence in brains, minds, and machines [J].
Gershman, Samuel J. ;
Horvitz, Eric J. ;
Tenenbaum, Joshua B. .
SCIENCE, 2015, 349 (6245) :273-278
[10]   CAUSALITY, COINTEGRATION, AND CONTROL [J].
GRANGER, CWJ .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 1988, 12 (2-3) :551-559