Nonparametric efficiency and artificial intelligence techniques in higher education: a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis

被引:0
作者
Dipierro, Anna Rita [1 ]
De Witte, Kristof [2 ,3 ]
Toma, Pierluigi [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calabria, Dept Econ Stat & Finance, Cosenza, Italy
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Fac Econ & Business, Leuven Econ Educ Res, Leuven, Belgium
[3] Maastricht Univ, UNU MERIT, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Salento, Dept Econ & Management, Lecce, Italy
关键词
higher education; efficiency; artificial intelligence; systematic literature review; bibliometric analysis; DATA-ENVELOPMENT-ANALYSIS; ITALIAN PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES; AUSTRALIAN UNIVERSITIES; PRODUCTIVITY CHANGE; TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY; RESEARCH PERFORMANCE; FRONTIER ESTIMATION; TECHNOLOGY-TRANSFER; INSTITUTIONS; DEA;
D O I
10.1111/itor.70070
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In a sector that needs to work as efficient as possible, artificial intelligence (AI) can guide the efficiency improvements of higher education institutions (HEIs). This paper explores both the AI literature and the efficiency literature as applied to HEIs following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review guidelines. The goal is to identify the relevant research that uses nonparametric efficiency and AI techniques within the HEI sector by examining articles published up to March 2025. Our findings provide a powerful mix of bibliometric and systematic literature review results that identify the main trends common to these two strands of research. The analysis highlights a long-standing tradition of applying nonparametric efficiency analysis to the sector, as it is attracting the increasing attention of AI scholars. We outline the substantial evidence that reveals much room for improvement in efficiency in the HEI sector, and how the application of AI may be well-suited. This is particularly evident as AI can support efficiency evaluations, particularly in handling tasks that traditional efficiency techniques alone cannot perform. A key contribution of this work is the identification of the opportunities for further research focus within this critical intersection between the two fields, which can inform both HEI administrators and policymakers.
引用
收藏
页数:38
相关论文
共 346 条
[1]   From equality to diversity: Classifying Russian universities in a performance oriented system [J].
Abankina, Irina ;
Aleskerov, Fuad ;
Belousova, Veronika ;
Gokhberg, Leonid ;
Kiselgof, Sofya ;
Petrushchenko, Vsevolod ;
Shvydun, Sergey ;
Zinkovsky, Kirill .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2016, 103 :228-239
[2]   The efficiency of Australian universities: a data envelopment analysis [J].
Abbott, M ;
Doucouliagos, C .
ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION REVIEW, 2003, 22 (01) :89-97
[3]   Comparative Departmental Efficiency Analysis within a University: A DEA Approach [J].
Abd Aziz, Nur Azlina ;
Janor, Roziah Mohd ;
Mahadi, Rasidah .
6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UNIVERSITY LEARNING AND TEACHING (INCULT 2012), 2013, 90 :540-548
[4]  
Abdalla RA., 2024, J OPEN INNOV TECHNOL, V10, P100327
[5]  
Abdo-Salloum A.M., 2025, Journal of Accounting Education, V70
[6]   Is 'first in family' a good indicator for widening university participation? [J].
Adamecz-Volgyi, Anna ;
Henderson, Morag ;
Shure, Nikki .
ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION REVIEW, 2020, 78
[7]   Random forest and path diagram taxonomies of risks influencing higher education construction projects [J].
Adedokun, Olufisayo ;
Egbelakin, Temitope ;
Omotayo, Temitope .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2024, 24 (01) :66-74
[8]   ChatGPT and the course vulnerability index [J].
Adilov, Nodir ;
Cline, Jeffrey W. ;
Hanke, Hui ;
Kauffman, Kent ;
Meneau, Lisa ;
Resendez, Elva ;
Singh, Shubham ;
Slaubaugh, Mike ;
Suntornpithug, Nichaya .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATION FOR BUSINESS, 2024, 99 (02) :125-132
[9]  
Adna N, 2022, J QUAL MEAS ANAL, V18, P1
[10]   Data envelopment analysis to the Italian university system: theoretical issues and policy implications [J].
Agasisti, Tommaso ;
Dal Bianco, Antonio .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2006, 8 (04) :344-367