Adopting the Intentional Stance Affects Social Attention When Interacting With a Humanoid Robot

被引:0
作者
Marchesi, Serena [1 ]
Kompatsiari, Kyveli [1 ,2 ,3 ]
De Tommaso, Davide [1 ]
Wykowska, Agnieszka [1 ]
机构
[1] Italian Inst Technol, Social Cognit Human Robot Interact, Via Enrico Melen 83, I-16152 Genoa, Italy
[2] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Appl Math & Comp Sci, Sect Cognit Syst, Lyngby, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Pioneer Ctr Artificial Intelligence P1A1, Copenhagen, Denmark
来源
TECHNOLOGY, MIND, AND BEHAVIOR | 2025年 / 6卷 / 02期
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
joint attention; Intentional Stance; gaze cueing; JOINT ATTENTION; EYE GAZE; ATTRIBUTION; MIND; MECHANISMS; COGNITION; CONTACT;
D O I
10.1037/tmb0000167
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Joint attention is a fundamental mechanism of human social cognition. Traditionally, joint attention has been experimentally investigated by means of the gaze cueing task in screen-based settings. Recently, the gaze cueing task has been implemented in more naturalistic and interactive settings, also with the embodied iCub robot, allowing for the investigation of concurrent factors influencing joint attention. Previous studies found that a communicative gaze before the gaze cue (i.e., mutual or avoiding gaze with the participants) influenced the subsequent joint attention by eliciting the gaze cueing effect only in the mutual gaze condition. In the present work, we first increased the likelihood of adoption of the Intentional Stance toward the robot by letting participants engage in a shared activity with the robot. Subsequent to this, we integrated the gaze cueing paradigm with the iCub robot, such that the robot cued participants' attention after establishing either mutual or avoiding gaze with them. In contrast to previous studies where the adoption of the Intentional Stance was not manipulated, our present results show that when the robot was perceived as an intentional agent, a gaze cueing effect was present for both mutual and avoiding gaze, thereby suggesting that participants might have interpreted both gaze conditions as intentional (and, thus, as communicative signals).
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 83 条
[61]  
Roncone A., 2016, Robotics: Science and Systems, V12, DOI [DOI 10.15607/RSS.2016.XII.022, 10.15607/rss.2016.xii.022]
[62]   Minds Made for Sharing: Initiating Joint Attention Recruits Reward-related Neurocircuitry [J].
Schilbach, Leonhard ;
Wilms, Marcus ;
Eickhoff, Simon B. ;
Romanzetti, Sandro ;
Tepest, Ralf ;
Bente, Gary ;
Shah, N. Jon ;
Fink, Gereon R. ;
Vogeley, Kai .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 22 (12) :2702-2715
[63]   Different models of anthropomorphism across cultures and ontological limits in current frameworks the integrative framework of anthropomorphism [J].
Spatola, Nicolas ;
Marchesi, Serena ;
Wykowska, Agnieszka .
FRONTIERS IN ROBOTICS AND AI, 2022, 9
[64]   The Intentional Stance Test-2: How to Measure the Tendency to Adopt Intentional Stance Towards Robots [J].
Spatola, Nicolas ;
Marchesi, Serena ;
Wykowska, Agnieszka .
FRONTIERS IN ROBOTICS AND AI, 2021, 8
[65]   Not afraid to trust you: Trustworthiness moderates gaze cueing but not in highly anxious participants [J].
Suessenbach, Felix ;
Schoenbrodt, Felix .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 26 (06) :670-678
[66]   Exploring Believable Character Animation Based on Principles of Animation and Acting Principles [J].
Sultana, Nekhat ;
Peng, Forest Lim Yan ;
Meissner, Nico .
2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATICS AND CREATIVE MULTIMEDIA (ICICM), 2013, :321-324
[67]  
Surden Harry, 2016, CARDozo L. RV., V38, P121
[68]   Gaze cueing by pareidolia faces [J].
Takahashi, Kohske ;
Watanabe, Katsumi .
I-PERCEPTION, 2013, 4 (08) :490-492
[69]   Mental-state attribution drives rapid, reflexive gaze following [J].
Teufel, Christoph ;
Alexis, Dean M. ;
Clayton, Nicola S. ;
Davis, Greg .
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2010, 72 (03) :695-705
[70]   Folk-Psychological Interpretation of Human vs. Humanoid Robot Behavior: Exploring the Intentional Stance toward Robots [J].
Thellman, Sam ;
Silvervarg, Annika ;
Ziemke, Tom .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 8