A Systematic Review of Fairness in Artificial Intelligence Algorithms

被引:16
作者
Xivuri, Khensani [1 ]
Twinomurinzi, Hossana [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Johannesburg, Auckland Pk, Johannesburg, South Africa
来源
RESPONSIBLE AI AND ANALYTICS FOR AN ETHICAL AND INCLUSIVE DIGITIZED SOCIETY, I3E 2021 | 2021年 / 12896卷
关键词
AI; Machine learning; Algorithms; Fairness; Bias; Ethics; DISCRIMINATION; FRAMEWORK; AI;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-85447-8_24
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Despite being the fastest-growing field because of its ability to enhance competitive advantage, there are concerns about the inherent fairness in Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms. In this study, a systematic review was performed on AI and the fairness of AI algorithms. 47 articles were reviewed for their focus, method of research, sectors, practices, and location. The key findings, summarized in a table, suggest that there is a lack of formalised AI terminology and definitions which subsequently results in contrasting views of AI algorithmic fairness. Most of the research is conceptual and focused on the technical aspects of narrow AI, compared to general AI or super AI. The public services sector is the target of most research, particularly criminal justice and immigration, followed by the health sector. AI algorithmic fairness is currently more focused on the technical and social/human aspects compared to the economic aspects. There was very little research from Asia, Middle East, Oceania, and Africa. The study makes suggestions for further research.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 284
页数:14
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   A Harm-Reduction Framework for Algorithmic Fairness [J].
Altman, Micah ;
Wood, Alexandra ;
Vayena, Effy .
IEEE SECURITY & PRIVACY, 2018, 16 (03) :34-45
[2]   Fairness and Transparency of Machine Learning for Trustworthy Cloud Services [J].
Antunes, Nuno ;
Balby, Leandro ;
Figueiredo, Flavio ;
Lourenco, Nuno ;
Meira Jr, Wagner ;
Santos, Walter .
2018 48TH ANNUAL IEEE/IFIP INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DEPENDABLE SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS WORKSHOPS (DSN-W), 2018, :188-193
[3]   Ethical considerations about artificial intelligence for prognostication in intensive care [J].
Beil, Michael ;
Proft, Ingo ;
van Heerden, Daniel ;
Sviri, Sigal ;
van Heerden, Peter Vernon .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE EXPERIMENTAL, 2019, 7 (01)
[4]   AI Fairness 360: An extensible toolkit for detecting and mitigating algorithmic bias [J].
Bellamy, R. K. E. ;
Dey, K. ;
Hind, M. ;
Hoffman, S. C. ;
Houde, S. ;
Kannan, K. ;
Lohia, P. ;
Martino, J. ;
Mehta, S. ;
Mojsilovie, A. ;
Nagar, S. ;
Ramamurthy, K. Natesan ;
Richards, J. ;
Saha, D. ;
Sattigeri, P. ;
Singh, M. ;
Varshney, K. R. ;
Zhang, Y. .
IBM JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 63 (4-5)
[5]   The Invisible Power of Fairness. How Machine Learning Shapes Democracy [J].
Beretta, Elena ;
Santangelo, Antonio ;
Lepri, Bruno ;
Vetro, Antonio ;
De Martin, Juan Carlos .
ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2019, 11489 :238-250
[6]   What Can Political Philosophy Teach Us about Algorithmic Fairness? [J].
Binns, Reuben .
IEEE SECURITY & PRIVACY, 2018, 16 (03) :73-80
[7]   Preparing for the future of Artificial Intelligence [J].
Alan Bundy .
AI & SOCIETY, 2017, 32 (2) :285-287
[8]  
Calo S., 2019, LNCS, V11550, DOI 10.1007978-3-030-17277-0
[9]   Artificial Intelligence and the 'Good Society': the US, EU, and UK approach [J].
Cath, Corinne ;
Wachter, Sandra ;
Mittelstadt, Brent ;
Taddeo, Mariarosaria ;
Floridi, Luciano .
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2018, 24 (02) :505-528
[10]   Green product development and performance of Brazilian firms: measuring the role of human and technical aspects [J].
Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose ;
Jugend, Daniel ;
Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz ;
Gunasekaran, Angappa ;
Latan, Hengky .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 87 :442-451