Family firms' innovation: The indirect effects of socioemotional wealth and the role of social capital

被引:10
作者
Stasa M. [1 ]
Machek O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Faculty of Business Administration, Prague University of Economics and Business, Nam. W. Churchilla 4, Prague
关键词
Innovation; Knowledge internalization; Social capital; Socioemotional wealth;
D O I
10.1016/j.hitech.2023.100454
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The paper aims to examine the role of socioemotional wealth (SEW), social capital (SC), and knowledge internalization in the innovation process of family firms. It draws upon recent shortcomings of management and family business literature including the need for exploring mediators in the innovation process and innovation heterogeneity of family businesses. A serial mediation model is tested on a dataset of 198 US family firms. We found SEW to be positively related to bonding SC. In turn, bonding SC was found to enhance bridging SC and knowledge internalization. Despite a negative relationship between bonding SC and innovation output, our analysis revealed three indirect paths that demonstrate the crucial role of SEW and bonding SC in promoting innovation in family firms. Specifically, SEW increases innovation output through the sequential effect of (1) bonding SC and bridging SC, (2) bonding SC and knowledge internalization, and (3) bonding SC, bridging SC, and knowledge internalization. The implications for theory and practice are discussed. © 2023 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 77 条
[11]  
Campbell J.M., Park J., Internal and external resources of competitive advantage for small business success: Validation across family ownership, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 27, 4, pp. 505-524, (2016)
[12]  
Cao Q., Lu Y., Dong D., Tang Z., Li Y., The roles of bridging and bonding in social media communities, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64, 8, pp. 1671-1681, (2013)
[13]  
Cao Q., Simsek Z., Jansen J.J., CEO social capital and entrepreneurial orientation of the firm: Bonding and bridging effects, Journal of Management, 41, 7, pp. 1957-1981, (2015)
[14]  
Carney M., Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 3, pp. 249-265, (2005)
[15]  
Carr J.C., Cole M.S., Ring J.K., Blettner D.P., A measure of variations in internal social capital among family firms, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35, 6, pp. 1207-1227, (2011)
[16]  
Carrasco-Hernandez A., Jimenez-Jimenez D., Can family firms innovate? Sharing internal knowledge from a social capital perspective, Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 11, 1, pp. 30-37, (2013)
[17]  
Ceci F., Masciarelli F., Poledrini S., How social capital affects innovation in a cultural network: Exploring the role of bonding and bridging social capital, European Journal of Innovation Management, 23, 5, pp. 895-918, (2020)
[18]  
Chirico F., Salvato C., Knowledge internalization and product development in family firms: When relational and affective factors matter, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40, 1, pp. 201-229, (2014)
[19]  
Cohen W.M., Levinthal D.A., Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 1, pp. 128-152, (1990)
[20]  
Costa V., Monteiro S., Key knowledge management processes for innovation: A systematic literature review, VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 46, 3, pp. 386-410, (2016)