Multigene Genetic Programming-Based Modeling for Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential of Soil Using Shear Wave Velocity

被引:0
作者
Naik, Jajati Keshari [1 ]
Muduli, Pradyut Kumar [2 ]
Behera, Gopal Charan [2 ]
机构
[1] Biju Patnaik Univ Technol, Rourkela, India
[2] Govt Coll Engn, Kalahandi 766002, Bhawanipatna, India
关键词
Liquefaction index; Shear wave velocity; GPTIPS-2; Boundary curve; MGGP; Genetic algorithm; RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s40515-025-00642-4
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The current investigation examined the assessment of the liquefaction potential of soil (LP) utilizing shear wave velocity (Vs) data through an evolutionary machine learning method known as multigene genetic programming (MGGP). One liquefaction index (LI) model was generated using 225 Vs data as per Andrus et al. (1999). According to the established LI model, a mathematical expression was developed for the cyclic resistance ratio (CRR) using MGGP. This expression represents the unknown limiting function, which separates the liquefaction (L) and non-liquefaction (NL) cases. The above CRR model, combined with the available mathematical formulation of cyclic stress ratio, forms the present MGGP-based deterministic approach for assessing LP in terms of factor of safety (Fs). Utilizing the above 225 Vs data, the overall rates of correct estimation for L and NL occurrences were estimated as 90.81%, 81.62%, and 68.60% by the above MGGP, existing ANN, and statistical methods, respectively, as per estimated Fs. Also, to verify the efficacy of the above evolved MGGP-based CRR formulation utilizing an independent 186 post-liquefaction Vs data as per (Juang and Chen Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 24, 1-27, 2000), the overall correct prediction rates for L and NL occurrences were estimated as 86.78%, 60.97%, and 69.39% by MGGP, existing ANN and statistical models, respectively, based on the estimated Fs.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Andrus R.D., 1999, Draft guidelines for evaluating liquefaction resistance using shear wave velocity measurements and simplified procedure
[2]  
Andrus R.D., 1997, NCEER WORKSHOP EVALU, P89
[3]   Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity [J].
Andrus, RD ;
Stokoe, KH .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2000, 126 (11) :1015-1025
[4]   Standard penetration test-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential [J].
Cetin, KO ;
Seed, RB ;
Der Kiureghian, A ;
Tokimatsu, K ;
Harder, LF ;
Kayen, RE ;
Moss, RES .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2004, 130 (12) :1314-1340
[5]   Prediction of residual friction angle of clays using artificial neural network [J].
Das, Sarat Kumar ;
Basudhar, Prabir Kumar .
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2008, 100 (3-4) :142-145
[6]   Effect of Soil-Type and Fines Content on Liquefaction Resistance-Shear-Wave Velocity Correlation [J].
Ecemis, Nurhan .
JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2020, 24 (08) :1311-1335
[7]   Decision Tree Approach for Soil Liquefaction Assessment [J].
Gandomi, Amir H. ;
Fridline, Mark M. ;
Roke, David A. .
SCIENTIFIC WORLD JOURNAL, 2013,
[8]   A new multi-gene genetic programming approach to nonlinear system modeling. Part I: materials and structural engineering problems [J].
Gandomi, Amir Hossein ;
Alavi, Amir Hossein .
NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2012, 21 (01) :171-187
[9]   A multi-model approach to analysis of environmental phenomena [J].
Giustolisi, O. ;
Doglioni, A. ;
Savic, D. A. ;
Webb, B. W. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2007, 22 (05) :674-682
[10]   A worldwide SPT-based soil liquefaction triggering analysis utilizing gene expression programming and Bayesian probabilistic method [J].
Goharzay, Maral ;
Noorzad, Ali ;
Ardakani, Ahmadreza Mahboubi ;
Jalal, Mostafa .
JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 9 (04) :683-693