Non-parametric Optimization Using Subspace-Based Objective Functions

被引:0
作者
Aloisio, Angelo [1 ]
Cirella, Riccardo [1 ]
Fragiacomo, Massimo [1 ]
Alaggio, Rocco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aquila, Via Giovanni Gronchi 18, I-67100 Laquila, Italy
来源
CIVIL STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING, CSHM-8 | 2021年 / 156卷
关键词
System Identification; Operational Modal Analysis; Uncertainty quantification; Discrete optimsization; Finite Element model; DAMAGE DETECTION; LOCALIZATION;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-74258-4_22
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The tuning of structural models to the experimental dynamic response entails the choice of a proper objective function. The goal of the so-called model updating process is the optimization of the chosen objective function, which measures the discrepancy between the experimental and simulated dynamic responses. This research focuses on the application of a non-parametric subspace-based objective function to the estimation of the modelling parameters of a beam-like structure. Differently from parametric optimization, non-parametric objective functions do not require the assessment of the modal parameters and descend from direct manipulation of the experimental and simulated data. The use of parametric optimization may lead to the discard of important information, which could be lost when extracting the modal parameters. Conversely, non-parametric optimization may store valuable information, which may lead to the estimation of both the stiffness and mass matrices even in the case of operational response, characterized by unknown excitation. In a second step, the research focuses on the quantification of the uncertainty of the parameters following an elementary Bayesian approach. The authors attempt to estimate the probability density function of the parameters by isolating and quantifying two sources of uncertainties: the uncertainty of the structural model and that of the optimization method.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 357
页数:19
相关论文
共 36 条
[21]  
Graff KF., 2012, WAVE MOTION ELASTIC
[22]   An approximate epistemic uncertainty analysis approach in the presence of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties [J].
Hofer, E ;
Kloos, M ;
Krzykacz-Hausmann, B ;
Peschke, J ;
Woltereck, M .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2002, 77 (03) :229-238
[23]   Temperature effects on static and dynamic behavior of Consoli Palace in Gubbio, Italy [J].
Kita, Alban ;
Cavalagli, Nicola ;
Ubertini, Filippo .
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2019, 120 :180-202
[24]   Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? [J].
Kiureghian, Armen Der ;
Didevsen, Ove .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2009, 31 (02) :105-112
[25]   Determination of structural and damage detection system influencing parameters on the value of information [J].
Long, Lijia ;
Dohler, Michael ;
Thoens, Sebastian .
STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2022, 21 (01) :19-36
[26]   Bayesian Model Updating and Its Limitations for Detecting Local Damage of an Existing Truss Bridge [J].
Mustafa, Samim ;
Matsumoto, Yasunao .
JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2017, 22 (07)
[27]   Reference based stochastic subspace identification in civil engineering [J].
Peeters, B ;
De Roeck, G .
INVERSE PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2000, 8 (01) :47-74
[28]  
Rainieri C., 2014, OPERATIONAL MODAL AN, P142, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-0767-0
[29]   Quantification of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties in level-1 probabilistic safety assessment studies [J].
Rao, K. Durga ;
Kushwaha, H. S. ;
Verma, A. K. ;
Srividya, A. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2007, 92 (07) :947-956
[30]   Uncertainty bounds on modal parameters obtained from stochastic subspace identification [J].
Reynders, Edwin ;
Pintelon, Rik ;
De Roeck, Guido .
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2008, 22 (04) :948-969