A narrative review of the use of PROMs and machine learning to impact value-based clinical decision-making

被引:0
作者
Pruski, Michal [1 ,2 ]
Willis, Simone [3 ]
Withers, Kathleen [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Hlth Sci, Manchester, England
[2] Cardiff & Vale UHB, CEDAR, Cardiff, Wales
[3] Cardiff Univ, Specialist Unit Review Evidence, Cardiff, Wales
[4] Univ Cardiff, Sch Engn, Cardiff, Wales
关键词
Prudent healthcare; Decision-making; Value in health; Algorithms; Prediction; Patient reported outcomes; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES; ADULT SPINAL DEFORMITY; ADVERSE EVENTS IRAES; ALGORITHMS PREDICT; INTERPRETABLE PREDICTIONS; FUNCTIONAL IMPROVEMENT; HIP; MODEL; ARTHROPLASTY;
D O I
10.1186/s12911-025-03083-8
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeThis review summarises the studies which combined Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and Machine Learning statistical computational techniques, to predict patient post-intervention outcomes. The aim of the project was to inform those working in value-based healthcare how Machine Learning can be used with PROMs to inform clinical practice.MethodsA systematic search strategy was developed and run in six databases. The records were reviewed by a reviewer if they matched the review scope, and these decisions were scrutinised by a second reviewer.Results82 records pertaining to 73 studies were identified. The review highlights the breadth of PROMs tools investigated, and the wide variety of Machine Learning techniques utilised across the studies. The findings suggest that there has been some success in predicting post-intervention patient outcomes. Nevertheless, there is no clear best performing Machine Learning approach to analyse this data, and while baseline PROMs scores are often a key predictor of post-intervention scores, this cannot always be assumed to be the case. Moreover, even when studies looked at similar conditions and patient groups, often different Machine Learning techniques performed best in each study.ConclusionThis review highlights that there is a potential for PROMs and Machine Learning methodology to predict patient post-intervention outcomes, but that best performing models from other previous studies cannot simply be adopted in new clinical contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 94 条
[61]  
Page Matthew J, 2021, BMJ, V372, pn71, DOI [10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906, 10.1136/bmj.n71]
[62]   PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews [J].
Page, Matthew J. ;
Moher, David ;
Bossuyt, Patrick M. ;
Boutron, Isabelle ;
Hoffmann, Tammy C. ;
Mulrow, Cynthia D. ;
Shamseer, Larissa ;
Tetzlaff, Jennifer M. ;
Akl, Elie A. ;
Brennan, Sue E. ;
Chou, Roger ;
Glanville, Julie ;
Grimshaw, Jeremy M. ;
Hrobjartsson, Asbjorn ;
Lalu, Manoj M. ;
Li, Tianjing ;
Loder, Elizabeth W. ;
Mayo-Wilson, Evan ;
McDonald, Steve ;
McGuinness, Luke A. ;
Stewart, Lesley A. ;
Thomas, James ;
Tricco, Andrea C. ;
Welch, Vivian A. ;
Whiting, Penny ;
McKenzie, Joanne E. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 372
[63]   The role of patient-reported outcome measures in trials of artificial intelligence health technologies: a systematic evaluation of ClinicalTrials.gov records (1997-2022) [J].
Pearce, Finlay J. ;
Rivera, Samantha Cruz ;
Liu, Xiaoxuan ;
Manna, Elaine ;
Denniston, Alastair K. ;
Calvert, Melanie J. .
LANCET DIGITAL HEALTH, 2023, 5 (03) :E160-E167
[64]   Machine learning to predict individual patient-reported outcomes at 2-year follow-up for women undergoing cancer-related mastectomy and breast reconstruction (INSPiRED-001) [J].
Pfob, Andre ;
Mehrara, Babak J. ;
Nelson, Jonas A. ;
Wilkins, Edwin G. ;
Pusic, Andrea L. ;
Sidey-Gibbons, Chris .
BREAST, 2021, 60 :111-122
[65]   Towards Patient-centered Decision-making in Breast Cancer Surgery Machine Learning to Predict Individual Patient-reported Outcomes at 1-year Follow-up [J].
Pfob, Andre ;
Mehrara, Babak J. ;
Nelson, Jonas A. ;
Wilkins, Edwin G. ;
Pusic, Andrea L. ;
Sidey-Gibbons, Chris .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2023, 277 (01) :E144-E152
[66]   Development of supervised machine learning algorithms for prediction of satisfaction at 2 years following total shoulder arthroplasty [J].
Polce, Evan M. ;
Kunze, Kyle N. ;
Fu, Michael C. ;
Garrigues, Grant E. ;
Forsythe, Brian ;
Nicholson, Gregory P. ;
Cole, Brian J. ;
Verma, Nikhil N. .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2021, 30 (06) :E290-E299
[67]   Dosimetric Predictors for Quality of Life After Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy via Deep Learning Network [J].
Qi, X. ;
Neylon, J. ;
Santhanam, A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (02) :S167-S167
[68]  
Ramkumar PN., 2021, J ISAKOS, V6, P387, DOI [10.1136/jisakos-2021-congress.16, DOI 10.1136/JISAKOS-2021-CONGRESS.16]
[69]   Effect of Preoperative Imaging and Patient Factors on Clinically Meaningful Outcomes and Quality of Life After Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation: A Machine Learning Analysis of Cartilage Defects of the Knee [J].
Ramkumar, Prem N. ;
Karnuta, Jaret M. ;
Haeberle, Heather S. ;
Rodeo, Scott A. ;
Nwachukwu, Benedict U. ;
Williams, Riley J., III .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 49 (08) :2177-2186
[70]   Radiographic Indices Are Not Predictive of Clinical Outcomes Among 1735 Patients Indicated for Hip Arthroscopic Surgery: A Machine Learning Analysis [J].
Ramkumar, Prem N. ;
Karnuta, Jaret M. ;
Haeberle, Heather S. ;
Sullivan, Spencer W. ;
Nawabi, Danyal H. ;
Ranawat, Anil S. ;
Kelly, Bryan T. ;
Nwachukwu, Benedict U. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 48 (12) :2910-2918