Psychometric testing of the Persian version of the nurse caring behavior scale

被引:0
作者
Jafari, Mojtaba [1 ]
Ghanei Gheshlagh, Reza [2 ,3 ]
Ebadi, Abbas [4 ]
Nassehi, Asra [1 ]
Sili, Alessandro [5 ]
Piredda, Michela [6 ]
机构
[1] Bam Univ Med Sci, Dept Nursing, Bam, Iran
[2] Univ Lahore, Lahore Sch Nursing, Lahore, Pakistan
[3] Biruni Univ, Nursing Dept, TR-34010 Istanbul, Turkiye
[4] Baqiyatallah Univ Med Sci, Clin Sci Inst, Nursing Care Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[5] Univ Hosp Tor Vergata, Nursing Dept, Rome, Italy
[6] Campus Biomed Roma Univ, Dept Med & Surg, Res Unit Nursing Sci, Rome, Italy
关键词
Nurse care behavior scale; Psychometrics; Validity; Reliability; PERCEPTIONS; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1186/s12912-025-03486-y
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background The patient's perception of nurses' caring behaviors predicts the quality of care they receive. Existing measurement tools have either not undergone psychometric evaluation or contain too many items, leading to participant fatigue. This study tested the psychometric properties of the 14-item Persian version of the nurse caring behavior scale (P-NCBS). Methods This cross-sectional study involved 327 hospitalized patients in Bam, Iran. The Nurse Caring Behavior Scale (NCBS) was translated into Persian using a forward-backward translation method. Psychometric evaluation included face validity, content validity, construct validity, and reliability testing. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to assess the scale dimensionality using multiple fit indices such as the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), the comparative fit index (CFI), the Tucker-Lewis index (TLI), and the standardized root mean square residual (SRMR). Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega coefficients were used to evaluate internal consistency. Data analysis was performed using Mplus version 8.1.8 and Jamovi version 2.4.14. Results The unidimensional model of the original scale was tested and confirmed confirmatory factor analysis with suitable fit indices: chi(2) (74, N = 327) = 344.752, p < 0.001; RMSEA = 0.106, CFI = 0.977, TLI = 0.972, and SRMR = 0.033. Both Cronbach's alpha (0.942) and McDonald's omega coefficient (0.943) indicated excellent internal consistency. Item factor loadings ranged from 0.620 to 0.907. The known-groups validity analysis revealed no significant association between demographic variables such as age, gender, education, or occupation and the total score of the Nurse Caring Behavior Scale. Conclusion The Persian version of NCBS can effectively evaluate care behaviors with strong psychometric properties and is applicable in quality audits, practice development, nursing education, and related research.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Perceptions of Caring Behaviors among Patients and Nurses [J].
Alikari, Victoria ;
Gerogianni, Georgia ;
Fradelos, Evangelos C. ;
Kelesi, Martha ;
Kaba, Evridiki ;
Zyga, Sofia .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 20 (01)
[2]   Quantitative measurement of caring [J].
Beck, CT .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1999, 30 (01) :24-32
[3]  
Borzou SR., 2014, J Qualitative Res Health Sci, V3, P1
[4]   RESEARCH DESIGN EFFECTS ON THE RELIABILITY OF RATING-SCALES - A META-ANALYSIS [J].
CHURCHILL, GA ;
PETER, JP .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1984, 21 (04) :360-375
[5]   Assessing nurse-patient interactions from a caring perspective: report of the development and preliminary psychometric testing of the Caring Nurse-Patient Interactions Scale [J].
Cossette, S ;
Cara, C ;
Ricard, N ;
Pepin, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2005, 42 (06) :673-686
[6]  
Coulombe Kathleen H, 2002, Outcomes Manag, V6, P138
[7]  
CRONIN SN, 1988, HEART LUNG, V17, P374
[8]  
DeVellis R.F., 2017, SCALE DEV THEORY APP
[9]  
DiNapoli P., 2010, International Journal for Human Caring, V14, P15, DOI DOI 10.20467/1091-5710.14.3.15
[10]   Dimensions of caring - Psychometric evaluation of the caring assessment tool [J].
Duffy, Joanne R. ;
Hoskins, Lois ;
Seifert, Rita Fjtrst .
ADVANCES IN NURSING SCIENCE, 2007, 30 (03) :235-245