Haptic neurorehabilitation and virtual reality for upper limb paralysis: A review

被引:28
作者
Piggott L. [1 ]
Wagner S. [1 ]
Ziat M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Psychology Department, Northern Michigan University, 1401 Presque Isle Avenue, Marquette, 49855, MI
关键词
Brain injury; Exoskeleton devices; Haptic devices; Neurorehabilitation; Robotics; Virtual reality;
D O I
10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2016016046
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Motor and sensory loss or dysfunction affects the quality of life for thousands of individuals daily. The upper limb, and especially the hand, are important for a person’s ability to complete activities of daily living. Traditional therapy methods focus on motor recovery, but future methods should include sensory recovery and should promote the use of the affected limb(s) at home. In this review, we highlight the current state-of-art robotic devices for the upper limb, and we discuss benefits of including haptic feedback and virtual reality environments during neurorehabilitation. Robotic devices, such as end-effector devices, grounded and ungrounded exoskeletons, have been developed to assist with various functions including individual finger, whole hand, and shoulder movements. Many robots highlighted in this paper are inexpensive and are small enough to be in a patient’s home, or allow for telerehabilitation. Virtual reality creates safe environments for patients to practice motor movements and interactive games improve enjoyment of therapy. Haptic feedback creates more immersive virtual reality, and contributes to the recovery of sensory function. Physiological studies conducted after brain trauma and with robotic devices contribute to the understanding of brain plasticity, andillustrate the efficacy of these technologies. We conclude by addressing the future direction of neurorehabilitation research. © 2016 Begell House, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 32
页数:31
相关论文
共 147 条
[61]  
Force Dimension, Omega.7 Haptic Device
[62]  
Bergamasco M., Avizzano C., Frisoli A., Ruffaldi E., Marcheschi S., Design and validation of a complete haptic system for manipulative tasks, Adv Robotics, 20, 3, pp. 367-389, (2006)
[63]  
Frisoli A., Barbagli F., Ruffaldi E., Avizzano C., Salisbury K., Bergamasco M., Evaluations of friction models for manipulative tasks using the grab system, 2Nd Annual Conference of ENACTIVE, (2005)
[64]  
Cameirao S., Badia S., Duarte E., Frisoli A., Verschure P., The combined impact of virtual reality neurorehabilitation and its interfaces on upper extremity functional recovery in patients with chronic stroke, Stroke, 43, 10, pp. 2720-2728, (2012)
[65]  
Lum P., Burgar C., Shor P., Majmundar M., Der Loos M.V., Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 83, 7, pp. 952-959, (2002)
[66]  
Lum P., Burgar C., Der Loos M.V., Shor P., Majmundar M., Yap R., The mime robotic system for upperlimb neurorehabilitation: Results from a clinical trial in subacute stroke, 9Th IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, (2005)
[67]  
Lum P., Burgar C., Der Loos M.V., Shor P., Majmundar M., Yap R., Mime robotic device for upper-limb neurorehabilitation in subacute stroke subjects: A followup study, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 43, 5, pp. 631-642, (2006)
[68]  
Krebs H., Hogan N., Aisen L., Volpe T., Robot-aided neurorehabilitation, IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng, 6, 1, pp. 75-87, (1998)
[69]  
Krebs H., Ferraro M., Buerger S., Newbery M., Makiyama A., Sandmann M., Lynch D., Volpe B., Hogan N., Rehabilitation robotics: Pilot trial of a spatial extension for mitmanus, J Neuroeng Rehabil, 1, (2004)
[70]  
Volpe B., Krebs H., Hogan N., Is robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation a realistic option?, Curr Opin Neurol, 14, 6, pp. 745-752, (2001)