Haptic neurorehabilitation and virtual reality for upper limb paralysis: A review

被引:32
作者
Piggott L. [1 ]
Wagner S. [1 ]
Ziat M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Psychology Department, Northern Michigan University, 1401 Presque Isle Avenue, Marquette, 49855, MI
关键词
Brain injury; Exoskeleton devices; Haptic devices; Neurorehabilitation; Robotics; Virtual reality;
D O I
10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2016016046
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Motor and sensory loss or dysfunction affects the quality of life for thousands of individuals daily. The upper limb, and especially the hand, are important for a person’s ability to complete activities of daily living. Traditional therapy methods focus on motor recovery, but future methods should include sensory recovery and should promote the use of the affected limb(s) at home. In this review, we highlight the current state-of-art robotic devices for the upper limb, and we discuss benefits of including haptic feedback and virtual reality environments during neurorehabilitation. Robotic devices, such as end-effector devices, grounded and ungrounded exoskeletons, have been developed to assist with various functions including individual finger, whole hand, and shoulder movements. Many robots highlighted in this paper are inexpensive and are small enough to be in a patient’s home, or allow for telerehabilitation. Virtual reality creates safe environments for patients to practice motor movements and interactive games improve enjoyment of therapy. Haptic feedback creates more immersive virtual reality, and contributes to the recovery of sensory function. Physiological studies conducted after brain trauma and with robotic devices contribute to the understanding of brain plasticity, andillustrate the efficacy of these technologies. We conclude by addressing the future direction of neurorehabilitation research. © 2016 Begell House, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 32
页数:31
相关论文
共 147 条
[1]  
Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation
[2]  
Pak S., Patten C., Strengthening to promote functional recovery poststroke: An evidence-based review, Top Stroke Rehabil, 15, 3, pp. 177-199, (2008)
[3]  
Demain S., Cunningham S., Metcalf C., Zheng D., Mer Ret G., A narrative review on haptic devices: Relating the physiology and psychophysical properties of the hand to devices for rehabilitation in central nervous system disorders, Disab Rehabil Assist Technol, 8, 3, pp. 301-316, (2012)
[4]  
Chen G., Chan C.K., Guo Z., Yu H., A review of lower extremity assistive robotic exoskeletons in rehabilitation therapy, Crit Rev Biomed Eng, 41, 45, pp. 343-363, (2013)
[5]  
National Stroke Association, What is Stroke?
[6]  
Adamovich S.V., Fluet G.G., Tunik E., Merians A.S., Sensorimotor training in virtual reality: A review, Neurorehabil, 25, 1, pp. 29-44, (2009)
[7]  
Hachisuka K., Makino K., Wada F., Saeki S., Yoshimoto N., Oxygen consumption, oxygen cost and physiological cost index in polio survivors: A comparison of walking without orthosis, with an ordinary or a carbon plastic kneeankle-foot orthosis, J Rehabil Med, 39, 8, pp. 646-650, (2007)
[8]  
Johnson B., Macwilliams B., Carey J., Viskochil D., D'Astous J., Stevenson D., Motor proficiency in children with neurofibromatosis type 1, Pediatr Phys Ther, 22, 4, pp. 344-348, (2010)
[9]  
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) Fact Sheet
[10]  
Hallet M., Neurophysiology of dystonia: The role of inhibition, Neurobiol Dis, 42, 2, pp. 177-184, (2011)