UAV Path Planning for Wildfire Tracking Using Partially Observable Markov Decision Process

被引:9
作者
Shobeiry, Poorya [1 ]
Xing, Ming [1 ]
Hu, Xiaolin [2 ]
Chao, Haiyang [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] Georgia State Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Atlanta, GA 30302 USA
[3] Univ Kansas, Dept Aerosp Engn, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
来源
AIAA SCITECH 2021 FORUM | 2021年
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
DEVS-FIRE; OPTIMIZATION; ENVIRONMENT; VEHICLES; SPREAD;
D O I
10.2514/6.2021-1677
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Real-time monitoring wildfire spread is of utmost importance to the decision making of the wildfire management. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) can provide a mobile sensing platform to perform this challenging task. In this paper, a path planning algorithm is designed to enable a group of UAVs to autonomously track wildfire fronts that develop in random directions. The wildfire evolution is generated from a high-fidelity simulation model. Since the full state of the wildfire is unknown, the path planning is formulated as the partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP), which is a dynamic optimization problem and solved approximately by the computationally efficient nominal belief state optimization method. The approach can plan the path autonomously, and the UAVs are able to track any randomly spreading fire fronts through a simple linear model. In addition, the challenges such as collision avoidance and practical constraints of the control variables can be taken into account in the framework of POMDP. Comprehensive simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed path planning algorithm.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Airborne Optical and Thermal Remote Sensing for Wildfire Detection and Monitoring [J].
Allison, Robert S. ;
Johnston, Joshua M. ;
Craig, Gregory ;
Jennings, Sion .
SENSORS, 2016, 16 (08)
[2]   The Ikhana unmanned airborne system (UAS) western states fire imaging missions: from concept to reality (2006-2010) [J].
Ambrosia, V. G. ;
Wegener, S. ;
Zajkowski, T. ;
Sullivan, D. V. ;
Buechel, S. ;
Enomoto, F. ;
Lobitz, B. ;
Johan, S. ;
Brass, J. ;
Hinkley, E. .
GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 26 (02) :85-101
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, AIAA GN
[4]  
Bertsekas D. P., 2011, Dynamic programming and optimal control, VII
[5]  
Bertsekas DP, 1995, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 34TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-4, P560, DOI 10.1109/CDC.1995.478953
[6]   Rollout algorithms for stochastic scheduling problems [J].
Bertsekas, DP ;
Castañon, DA .
JOURNAL OF HEURISTICS, 1999, 5 (01) :89-108
[7]   A comparison of Monte Carlo tree search and rolling horizon optimization for large-scale dynamic resource allocation problems [J].
Bertsimas, Dimitris ;
Griffith, J. Daniel ;
Gupta, Vishal ;
Kochenderfer, Mykel J. ;
Misic, Velibor V. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2017, 263 (02) :664-678
[8]   REAL-TIME OBSTACLE AVOIDANCE FOR FAST MOBILE ROBOTS [J].
BORENSTEIN, J ;
KOREN, Y .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1989, 19 (05) :1179-1187
[9]   A receding horizon approach for dynamic UAV mission management [J].
Cassandras, CG ;
Li, W .
ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES FOR SIMULATION SCIENCE VII, 2003, 5091 :284-293
[10]   Partially Observable Markov Decision Process Approximations for Adaptive Sensing [J].
Chong, Edwin K. P. ;
Kreucher, Christopher M. ;
Hero, Alfred O., III .
DISCRETE EVENT DYNAMIC SYSTEMS-THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2009, 19 (03) :377-422