Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Prediabetes: A Scoping Review

被引:0
作者
Lalani, Benjamin [1 ]
Herur, Rohan [1 ]
Zade, Daniel [1 ]
Collins, Grace [1 ]
Dishong, Devin M. [1 ]
Mehta, Setu [1 ]
Shim, Jalene [1 ]
Valdez, Yllka [1 ]
Mathioudakis, Nestoras [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Div Endocrinol Diabet & Metab, 1830 East Monument St,Suite 333, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
artificial intelligence; diabetes; lifestyle intervention; machine learning; impaired glucose tolerance; prediabetes; IMPAIRED FASTING GLUCOSE; PREDICTION; RISK; PREVENTION; PROGRESSION; DIAGNOSIS; SUPPORT; INTERVENTIONS; PREVALENCE; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1177/19322968251351995
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Prediabetes is a prevalent condition in which early detection and lifestyle interventions can prevent or delay progression to diabetes. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) offer enhanced tools for diagnosis, risk stratification, and scalable delivery of lifestyle interventions. This review synthesizes current applications of AI/ML in patients with prediabetes.Methods: We conducted a scoping review using PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science (through May 2025) to identify original studies applying AI/ML to prediabetes prediction or management. Population-level forecasting and models combining prediabetes with other conditions were excluded. Data were extracted via structured REDCap instruments and validated through secondary review. Descriptive statistics summarized findings.Results: Of 2072 records screened, 149 studies met criteria: 118 prediction model studies, 20 intervention studies, and 11 miscellaneous. Machine learning models primarily targeted prediction of prediabetes, progression to diabetes, diabetic complications, and glucose metrics. Overall model performance was favorable (mean C-statistic 0.81), with random forests, neural networks, and support vector machines showing better performance. Only 20 studies reported external validation, few compared ML to standard risk tools, and data/code availability was limited. Six AI-based diabetes prevention programs showed positive clinical outcomes, though randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence was limited. Three personalized nutrition interventions showed mixed efficacy.Conclusion: Most AI/ML research in prediabetes focused on predictive modeling, which shows promise but limited translation to real-world settings. Artificial intelligence-based interventions may scale behavioral change support but need further evaluation versus standard care. Future efforts should prioritize external validation, assess added value over standard tools, and address barriers to integration into care.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 177 条
[1]   Machine Learning Reveals Time-Varying Microbial Predictors with Complex Effects on Glucose Regulation [J].
Aasmets, Oliver ;
Lull, Kreete ;
Lang, Jennifer M. ;
Pan, Calvin ;
Kuusisto, Johanna ;
Fischer, Krista ;
Laakso, Markku ;
Lusis, Aldons J. ;
Org, Elin .
MSYSTEMS, 2021, 6 (01)
[2]   Effectiveness of artificial intelligence vs. human coaching in diabetes prevention: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial [J].
Abusamaan, Mohammed S. ;
Ballreich, Jeromie ;
Dobs, Adrian ;
Kane, Brian ;
Maruthur, Nisa ;
Mcgready, John ;
Riekert, Kristin ;
Wanigatunga, Amal A. ;
Alderfer, Mary ;
Alver, Defne ;
Lalani, Benjamin ;
Ringham, Benjamin ;
Vandi, Fatmata ;
Zade, Daniel ;
Mathioudakis, Nestoras N. .
TRIALS, 2024, 25 (01)
[3]  
Acciaroli Giada, 2018, J Diabetes Sci Technol, V12, P105, DOI 10.1177/1932296817710478
[4]   Diabetes Mellitus Disease Prediction and Type Classification Involving Predictive Modeling Using Machine Learning Techniques and Classifiers [J].
Ahamed, B. Shamreen ;
Arya, Meenakshi S. ;
Sangeetha, S. K. B. ;
Auxilia Osvin, Nancy V. .
APPLIED COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND SOFT COMPUTING, 2022, 2022
[5]   After-meal blood glucose level prediction for type-2 diabetic patients [J].
Ahmed, Benzir Md ;
Ali, Mohammed Eunus ;
Masud, Mohammad Mehedy ;
Azad, Mohammad Raihan ;
Naznin, Mahmuda .
HELIYON, 2024, 10 (07)
[6]   Intelligent Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes and Impaired Glucose Tolerance Using Deep Neural Networks [J].
Alanis, Alma Y. ;
Sanchez, Oscar D. ;
Vaca-Gonzalez, Alonso ;
Rangel-Heras, Eduardo .
MATHEMATICS, 2023, 11 (19)
[7]   Feature importance and model performance for prediabetes prediction: A comparative study [J].
Alqahtani, Saeed Awad M. ;
Alobaid, Hussah M. ;
Alshammari, Jamilah ;
Alqarzae, Safa A. ;
Aloyouni, Sheka Yagub ;
Al-Eidan, Ahood A. ;
Alhamad, Salwa ;
Almiman, Abeer ;
Alkhulaifi, Fadwa M. ;
Alomar, Suliman .
JOURNAL OF KING SAUD UNIVERSITY SCIENCE, 2024, 36 (11)
[8]   Multiclass classification of metabolic conditions using fasting plasma levels of glucose and insulin [J].
Altuve, Miguel ;
Alvarez, Antonio J. ;
Severeyn, Erika .
HEALTH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 11 (04) :953-962
[9]   The Diabetes Prevention Gap And Opportunities To Increase Participation In Effective Interventions [J].
Alva, Maria L. ;
Chakkalakal, Rosette J. ;
Moln, Tannaz ;
Galaviz, Karla, I .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2022, 41 (07) :971-979
[10]  
Anderson Jeffrey P, 2015, J Diabetes Sci Technol, V10, P6, DOI 10.1177/1932296815620200