Quantifying and valuing forests as a nature-based solution for ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction: A systematic review

被引:0
作者
Ashrafizadeh, Elham [1 ]
Yousefpour, Rasoul [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, John H Daniels Fac Architecture Landscape & Design, 1 Spadina Crescent, Toronto, ON M5S 2J5, Canada
来源
NATURE-BASED SOLUTIONS | 2025年 / 7卷
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Protective forests; Ecosystem services; Natural hazards; Ecosystem disaster risk reduction; Eco-DRR; Nature-based solutions; Risk management; LAND-COVER CHANGES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ROCKFALL RISK; FLOOD RISK; WATERSHED PROTECTION; AVALANCHE PROTECTION; LANDSLIDE OCCURRENCE; MOUNTAIN FORESTS; MANGROVE FOREST; SERVICES;
D O I
10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100242
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Forests play a significant role in mitigating natural hazards and are increasingly recognized as nature-based solutions (NBS) for ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction (Eco-DRR). However, their protective effects remain under-quantified, limiting their integration into mainstream risk management practices. This systematic review investigates the current state of quantitative and monetary assessments of forests as Eco-DRR measures. To this end, we focused exclusively on studies reporting quantitative outcomes for forests across a broad range of gravitational and hydroclimatic hazards. The review aims to: 1) provide a comprehensive overview of the concepts and methodologies used to quantify the protective effects of forests; 2) summarize and analyze quantitative evidence and its variation across forest types, methodologies and hazard types; 3) identify research gaps; and 4) synthesize a conceptual framework to facilitate further research. We screened 3568 papers, from which 77 studies were selected, comprising 155 data points. Drawing on the insights from these studies, we developed a conceptual framework to guide future research in this field. Methodologies for the quantification of protective effects were categorized into three main groups: hazard-based, risk-based, and economic valuation methods, with hazard-based approaches being the most frequently applied, followed by economic valuation. Reported monetary values for forest protective effects varied significantly, ranging from less than 1 USD to over 41,000 USD per hectare per year. We investigated potential sources of this variation, including forest type, hazard type, and the methodologies employed. Our findings underscore the need for more robust hazard models tailored to specific hazard types that integrate forest characteristics, climate change impacts, and post-disturbance forest recovery. We emphasize the importance of applying risk-based methods when evaluating the protective effect of forests. To this end, the review provides a framework to guide future efforts and support the integration of forests into disaster risk reduction and climate adaptation strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 146 条
[1]   ASFORESEE: A Harmonized Model for Economic Evaluation of Forest Protection against Rockfall [J].
Accastello, Cristian ;
Bianchi, Ettore ;
Blanc, Simone ;
Brun, Filippo .
FORESTS, 2019, 10 (07)
[2]   Estimating the willingness to pay for regulating and cultural ecosystem services from forested Siwalik landscapes: perspectives of disaggregated users [J].
Acharya, Ram Prasad ;
Maraseni, Tek Narayan ;
Cockfield, Geoff .
ANNALS OF FOREST SCIENCE, 2021, 78 (02)
[3]   Storm protection service of the Sundarbans mangrove forest, Bangladesh [J].
Akber, Md. Ali ;
Patwary, Muhammad Mainuddin ;
Islam, Md. Atikul ;
Rahman, Mohammad Rezaur .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2018, 94 (01) :405-418
[4]   Forests and floods: A new paradigm sheds light on age-old controversies [J].
Alila, Younes ;
Kuras, Piotr K. ;
Schnorbus, Markus ;
Hudson, Robert .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2009, 45
[5]   Assessing the Co-Benefits of green-blue-grey infrastructure for sustainable urban flood risk management [J].
Alves, Alida ;
Gersonius, Berry ;
Kapelan, Zoran ;
Vojinovic, Zoran ;
Sanchez, Arlex .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 239 :244-254
[6]   Nature-based solutions (NbS) for reducing the risk of shallow landslides: Where do we stand? [J].
Arce-Mojica, Teresa de Jesus ;
Nehren, Udo ;
Sudmeier-Rieux, Karen ;
Julio Miranda, Patricia ;
Anhuf, Dieter .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2019, 41
[7]   Valuing ecosystem functions: An empirical study on the storm protection function of Bhitarkanika mangrove ecosystem, India [J].
Badola, R ;
Hussain, SA .
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2005, 32 (01) :85-92
[8]   Assessing the ecosystem service flood protection of a riparian forest by applying a cascade approach [J].
Barth, Nina-Christin ;
Doell, Petra .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2016, 21 :39-52
[9]  
Basher LR, 2013, ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN NEW ZEALAND: CONDITIONS AND TRENDS, P363
[10]   Forest impact on floods due to extreme rainfall and snowmelt in four Latin American environments 1: Field data analysis [J].
Bathurst, James C. ;
Iroume, Andres ;
Cisneros, Felipe ;
Fallas, Jorge ;
Iturraspe, Rodolfo ;
Gavino Novillo, Marcelo ;
Urciuolo, Adriana ;
de Bievre, Bert ;
Guerrero Borges, Veronica ;
Coello, Cristian ;
Cisneros, Pedro ;
Gayoso, Jorge ;
Miranda, Miriam ;
Ramirez, Marco .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2011, 400 (3-4) :281-291