A Review of Distributed Ledger Technologies for Satellite Operations

被引:0
作者
Probert, Beth [1 ]
Clark, Ruaridh A. [1 ]
Blasch, Erik [2 ]
Macdonald, Malcolm [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Appl Space Technol Lab, Glasgow G1 1XW, Scotland
[2] Air Force Off Sci Res AFOSR, Arlington, VA 22203 USA
关键词
Satellites; Reviews; Space vehicles; Distributed ledger; Blockchains; Internet of Things; Consensus protocol; Smart contracts; Orbits; Focusing; Autonomous networks; distributed ledger technology; machine-to-machine communications; satellite communications; ACCESS-CONTROL; BLOCKCHAIN; INTERNET; THINGS; CHALLENGES; CONSENSUS; NETWORKS; SYSTEMS; CONSTELLATIONS; COMMUNICATION;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3588688
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
As the density of objects in Low Earth Orbit continues to increase, greater levels of coordination among satellites are needed to ensure the continued operation and sustainability of the space environment. Existing centralised space governance frameworks suffer from delays, ambiguity, and vulnerability to manipulation, introducing further complexity and risk into satellite operations, and hindering the development of new space-based services. This review examines the feasibility of leveraging Distributed Ledger Technologies to facilitate secure, decentralised, and autonomous coordination among satellites, conceptualised as an extension of Internet of Things networks. By examining analogous applications in swarms of Uncrewed Aerial Systems, and the Internet of Things, key system requirements for decentralised satellite coordination are defined. It is found that traditional Blockchain systems using Proof of Work-based consensus mechanisms are impractical for use in space-based systems, whilst Directed Acyclic Graph architectures, Sharded Blockchain architectures, and non-deterministic Proof of Stake consensus mechanisms are the most suitable. Critical gaps preventing the implementation of Distributed Ledger Technologies in the space environment are identified. These include wider regulatory considerations, and technical obstacles relating to the storage of transactional data and reaching consensus in time-varying, asynchronous networks.
引用
收藏
页码:123230 / 123258
页数:29
相关论文
共 179 条
[41]   Access Control for Distributed Ledgers in the Internet of Things: A Networking Approach [J].
Cullen, Andrew ;
Ferraro, Pietro ;
Sanders, William ;
Vigneri, Luigi ;
Shorten, Robert .
IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL, 2022, 9 (03) :2277-2292
[42]   On the Resilience of DAG-Based Distributed Ledgers in IoT Applications [J].
Cullen, Andrew ;
Ferraro, Pietro ;
King, Christopher ;
Shorten, Robert .
IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL, 2020, 7 (08) :7112-7122
[43]   Investigating Software Testing and Maintenance of Open -Source Distributed Ledger [J].
Cvitic, Petya Hristova ;
Dobslaw, Felix ;
De Oliveira Neto, Francisco Gomes .
2023 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ANALYSIS, EVOLUTION AND REENGINEERING, SANER, 2023, :886-896
[44]  
Dabbish L, 2012, P ACM 2012 C COMP SU, P1277
[45]  
Dannen C., 2017, INTRO ETHEREUM SOLID
[46]  
de La Beaujardiere J, 2019, INT GEOSCI REMOTE SE, P5293, DOI [10.1109/igarss.2019.8898117, 10.1109/IGARSS.2019.8898117]
[47]   A Blockchain-Based Authentication Protocol Using Cryptocurrency Technology in LEO Satellite Networks [J].
Deng, Xia ;
Shao, Junbin ;
Chang, Le ;
Liang, Junbin .
ELECTRONICS, 2021, 10 (24)
[48]  
Dhillon V., 2017, Blockchain Enabled Applications - Understand the Blockchain Ecosystemand How to Make it Work for You, P139, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-4842-3081-710, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4842-3081-7_10, 10.1007/978-1-4842-3081-7_10, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4842-3081-7]
[49]  
Dorri A, 2016, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:1608.05187
[50]  
Dziubak S., 2023, Modern Manage. Rev., V28, P7, DOI [10.7862/rz.2023.mmr.14, DOI 10.7862/RZ.2023.MMR.14]